I applied through idp and they told me that in SDS category we do not need to show any financial proofs...
Visa for January 2019 status
- Thread starter IndianMan_998
- Start date
This is not the reality, if this was the case then anybody who does not have money to pay their fees and manage living expenses in Canada but is eligible for SDS category can apply and get VISA. However, the reality is just the opposite. see the below details to know about funding under SDS check out the 4th page of PDF under below URL.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/kits/forms/IMM5976E.pdf
( Evidence of the purchase of a Guaranteed Investment Certificate (GIC) from a participating financial institution in the amount of $10,000
Copy of receipts showing payment of tuition fees for the entire first year.
If applicable, scholarships/other funding: Original letter containing details of the funding you are to receive during each year of your proposed course of study.)
As far as IDP is the concern, we all know that IDP didn't charge money for their service, they get some percentage of money from your college on completion of each semester. Therefore, they might be chances of having such people who do not have proper knowledge but working at IDP and guiding you. So, it again depends on the person who is assisting in your VISA application process.
I would suggest you do all the R&D on your own, have any issue take their help at IDP and then verify it on cic.gc.ca whether it's true or not. There will be many people who will suggest you multiple ways of solving an issue. But, the smart way is to listen to everyone and do your own analysis to find out which solution fits best for you.
Hope this will clear all your doubts.
Apply for CAIPS notes before reapplying, this will give you detailed information about your refusal, play smart to save money and time don't assume anything.
Are you talking about gic ???... i have paid my gic fees and i also submitted my receipt...i thought you were talking about bank balance statement which was must shown in SPP program...
If you have paid the GIC, and 1 year fees still you required to show them your source of income which can be shown by ITR or Form 16.
Let's make it more simple, get your CAIPS notes, it will give you Al the information whether you got refused in the basis of ITR or some other issues like relevant course selection according to your study and working background.
Simply go for CAIPS notes .
in sds its not neccasory but if u attach it gives more weightage increasing chances of visa
Under SDS, only GIC and 1yr tuition receipt are required as financial proof. Although, it doesn’t hurt a bit if the applicant would still show bank statements, etc.
This conversation happening regarding the source of funds like ITR ( income tax return ) documents or Form 16 which will let the know visa officer about the source of funds. Bank statement is not mandatory as GIC and 1 year tuition fees are sufficient for SDS .However, showing extra funds like bank statement or property valuation by charterdc accountant can be an added advantage but it didn't give gaurantee of visa success, I know many applications have shown total of $200000 CAD still they got refusal.
What I was saying is to do route cause analysis which can be done by getting CAIPS notes Canada immigration department by a Canadian based lawyer who is only authorized to apply on behalf of an applicant. There are many private firms have their website giving such service of CAIPS notes.
Better to keep issue simple instead of making them complex.
Refusal can happen even if applicant have enough funds for a ten year study. What I’m saying is that under SDS, no other financial documents are required. There are applicants who were approved with only theGIC and 1 year tuition receipt, did not submit ITR either. Again, it is still advisable to show more funds.
But I agree with you about the CAIPS/GCMS notes to know the exact reason for refusal. An immigration lawyer may help, but then, other 2nd time applicants were able to get approval without lawyer’s help. They simply addressed their refusal reason as per CAIPS notes.
Look at below line carefully read it then reply, what i was talking about is that Canadian Immigration didnt provide CAIPS notes direct to the applicant. it cn be obtained by a canadian lawyer, as well as some private firms like CAIPS.CA are providing their service to all those applicants who want CAIPS notes.
( What I was saying is to do route cause analysis which can be done by getting CAIPS notes Canada immigration department by a Canadian based lawyer who is only authorized to apply on behalf of an applicant. There are many private firms have their website giving such service of CAIPS notes.)
Look at your below response it contradict to what i was telling is that Immigration lawyer for CAIPS notes. however, you are talking about VISA submission.
(An immigration lawyer may help, but then, other 2nd time applicants were able to get approval without lawyer’s help. They simply addressed their refusal reason as per CAIPS notes.)
Private firms, not necessarily immigration lawyers. Private firms may have lawyers from within their company. But it was not the lawyer per se that is needed.
You can verify from here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/transparency/access-information-privacy/requests-information-act.html
“To send a request you must be a Canadian citizen, a permanent resident of Canada or an individual or corporation currently in Canada.”
There is no mention that a lawyer is a must.
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/transparency/access-information-privacy/requests-information-act.html
“To send a request you must be a Canadian citizen, a permanent resident of Canada or an individual or corporation currently in Canada.”
There is no mention that a lawyer is a must.
So, what you are saying is that any lawyer can work under private firms who assist for immigration-related work of Canada, not the one who is specially dealing with immigration laws. Any private firm assists with such immigration-related issue will always have experienced people in the relevant field they will not keep anyone like this who even don't have any knowledge about the immigration laws of Canada,
The lawyer is for those are not based in Canada and; living outside of Canada even those who don't have any related in Canada got my point. This Link I have already checked months ago so no need to show it.