+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Parents Sponsorship - Stop Immigration Lottery

Rob_TO

VIP Member
Nov 7, 2012
11,427
1,551
Toronto
Category........
FAM
Visa Office......
Seoul, Korea
App. Filed.......
13-07-2012
AOR Received.
18-08-2012
File Transfer...
21-08-2012
Med's Done....
Sent with App
Passport Req..
N/R - Exempt
VISA ISSUED...
30-10-2012
LANDED..........
16-11-2012
Parents are not exactly foreigners if they are soon to be permanent residents of Canada so as international students and other foreign workers. If people think they are hurting the economy, why don't they lower the number of people coming to Canada in the first place? Or if you like, the rent will go up.
Just in response to the other poster. Personally I couldn't care less if parents or any other newly immigrants buy homes here or not, just saying there are usually 2 views to any issue.
 

Rob_TO

VIP Member
Nov 7, 2012
11,427
1,551
Toronto
Category........
FAM
Visa Office......
Seoul, Korea
App. Filed.......
13-07-2012
AOR Received.
18-08-2012
File Transfer...
21-08-2012
Med's Done....
Sent with App
Passport Req..
N/R - Exempt
VISA ISSUED...
30-10-2012
LANDED..........
16-11-2012
You are implying that wealthy people are obese? You are wrong.

Here in Canada, for example, obesity is increasingly coming to be seen as a disease of the poor.

Go google Poverty and Obesity.

Are you guys scraping the barrel now?
I don't understand why you are so obsessed with this.

You can probably also show studies that females in general incur less costs and wait times to healthcare than males, or people from specific countries incur less costs than other countries, or certain races incur less costs than other races.

But there is zero chance we suddenly start saying mothers will be given higher priority vs fathers, or parents from certain countries over another. Same with parents income levels. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. You are looking obsessed continually arguing it.

Having LICO to begin with ensures parents will not be living in poverty when they arrive and that is all that matters. This point is already considered and closed out.
 

nayr69sg

Champion Member
Apr 13, 2017
1,571
679
I don't understand why you are so obsessed with this.

You can probably also show studies that females in general incur less costs and wait times to healthcare than males, or people from specific countries incur less costs than other countries, or certain races incur less costs than other races.

But there is zero chance we suddenly start saying mothers will be given higher priority vs fathers, or parents from certain countries over another. Same with parents income levels. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. You are looking obsessed continually arguing it.

Having LICO to begin with ensures parents will not be living in poverty when they arrive and that is all that matters. This point is already considered and closed out.
I have taken your point. And I agree IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.

I am merely stating that we should STOP TALKING ABOUT COSTS.

The PGP program is humanitarian. The lottery system while not perfect is a way to allocate PGP spots randomly to applicants regardless of race, religion, language or socioeconomic status.

The priority is that it should be given fairly. Canada can afford it.

What irks me is when people start linking costs. Like some people saying how rich people should just go for Supervisa and not PGP without any rebuttal.

Fair is fair. Don't discriminate people who are poor or rich. It will never end.
 

nayr69sg

Champion Member
Apr 13, 2017
1,571
679
anyway where is 4parents? Where are you? You have nothing to say?

for the record I am not 4parents. I think the moderator thinks this is my thread. It is not. I did not start it.
 

Rob_TO

VIP Member
Nov 7, 2012
11,427
1,551
Toronto
Category........
FAM
Visa Office......
Seoul, Korea
App. Filed.......
13-07-2012
AOR Received.
18-08-2012
File Transfer...
21-08-2012
Med's Done....
Sent with App
Passport Req..
N/R - Exempt
VISA ISSUED...
30-10-2012
LANDED..........
16-11-2012
I have taken your point. And I agree IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.

I am merely stating that we should STOP TALKING ABOUT COSTS.

The PGP program is humanitarian. The lottery system while not perfect is a way to allocate PGP spots randomly to applicants regardless of race, religion, language or socioeconomic status.

The priority is that it should be given fairly. Canada can afford it.

What irks me is when people start linking costs. Like some people saying how rich people should just go for Supervisa and not PGP without any rebuttal.

Fair is fair. Don't discriminate people who are poor or rich. It will never end.
Honestly I have no idea what you're trying to argue.

There are only 2 costs that matter and that can result in parents refusal
1. Sponsor not meeting LICO
2. Parents not passing excessive demand cost test

Both of these costs are very important to consider even if it is a H&C program. If we are all in agreement here I have no idea why there are multiple pages on this thread arguing this.
 

nayr69sg

Champion Member
Apr 13, 2017
1,571
679
I would like to introduce you to my partner, my ex-husband and me. I left my parents and 9 siblings (and their spouses & children) behind when I emigrated to Australia in 2006. My now ex-husband left his parents and 5 siblings behind when we emigrated. My fiance left his widowed mother and 3 siblings in the UK when he emigrated to Australia in 1985.

Does that mean we don't care about our parents? As adults our lives are ours to live and if that means leaving our families then that's what adults do. If you cannot live without your parents nearby then I would suggest one of three options: 1) Move back to your home country, 2) move to a third country that will allow you to bring your parents or 3) learn to live with long holidays together and Skype/email/snail mail.


Canada's health care and pension systems are already struggling. If every immigrant was allowed to bring their parents what do you think that would do to the provincial health budgets? Elderly people are a drain on the health system and unfortunately do not contribute to the costs they incur. Canada, as with most countries is looking to attract younger, more skilled immigrants who will contribute to the economy of the country, not be a burden to the already overstretched public welfare systems.

Rob_TO, my thoughts moved towards breaking down this cost argument from what DollyM wrote. Buletruck had also alluded to this prior to DollyM's post.

You see the arguments often shift in this manner. From equality in selection to then saying elderly are a drain and that is why with skilled immigrant programs we use a merit based system.

However as I have shown, if you use a merit based system for elderly (face it they CAN contribute and different SES groups would use differing amount of healthcare resources) then the argument shifts back towards discrimination and inequality.

I just wanted to show that the merit system CAN be applied to the PGP. It is not true that ALL PGP never contribute anything to Canada.

Let's stick to the equality and non discrimination and not bring costs into the picture because it really insults those of us who know that our parents can contribute and will contribute if they came here.
 

nayr69sg

Champion Member
Apr 13, 2017
1,571
679
Honestly I have no idea what you're trying to argue.

There are only 2 costs that matter and that can result in parents refusal
1. Sponsor not meeting LICO
2. Parents not passing excessive demand cost test

Both of these costs are very important to consider even if it is a H&C program. If we are all in agreement here I have no idea why there are multiple pages on this thread arguing this.
I agree wholeheartedly with you on the lottery system and being fair. This is I admit a change in stance from what I had before. Having those debates with you have made me change my view to agree that the lottery system is actually the fairest way to allocate spots despite it being detrimental to my personal cause. So thank you Rob_TO for tolerating me.

The costs argument that I am responding to isn't the Sponsor meeting LICO or parent not passing excessive demand cost test. It is the blatant accusation of some who say that PGP is nothing but a drain and that the PGP never contribute anything.

PGP group can contribute. A simple one would be helping with childcare. Allowing couples to both work and reduce expenses on childcare fees.

And as I mentioned there will be estate duty on their assets upon demise. Also any new immigrant will require additional space (housing expenditure), appliances etc. If there are accompanying funds from overseas, it is an influx and boost to the Canadian economy.

Rob_TO, do you see where I'm coming from? I take offense when people imply that all PGP are a burden. It is not necessarily the case. In fact if you tried using a merit based system you CAN choose the ones who will contribute. However I am NOT proposing that there be a merit based system. I used to. But I no longer support discrimination. On the other hand, when someone starts saying that my parents will come here and do nothing but consume resources and contribute nothing, I take offense to that. If you truly believe that to be the over riding concern then go support a merit based system. Otherwise please don't bring this up. You cannot have your cake and eat it.
 
Last edited:

Rob_TO

VIP Member
Nov 7, 2012
11,427
1,551
Toronto
Category........
FAM
Visa Office......
Seoul, Korea
App. Filed.......
13-07-2012
AOR Received.
18-08-2012
File Transfer...
21-08-2012
Med's Done....
Sent with App
Passport Req..
N/R - Exempt
VISA ISSUED...
30-10-2012
LANDED..........
16-11-2012
I agree wholeheartedly with you on the lottery system and being fair. This is I admit a change in stance from what I had before.

The costs argument that I am responding to isn't the Sponsor meeting LICO or parent not passing excessive demand cost test. It is the blatant accusation of some who say that PGP is nothing but a drain and that the PGP never contribute anything.

PGP group can contribute. A simple one would be helping with childcare. Allowing couples to both work and reduce expenses on childcare fees.

And as I mentioned there will be estate duty on their assets upon demise. Also any new immigrant will require additional space (housing expenditure), appliances etc. If there are accompanying funds from overseas, it is an influx and boost to the Canadian economy.

Rob_TO, do you see where I'm coming from? I take offense when people imply that all PGP are a burden. It is not necessarily the case. However I am NOT proposing that there be a merit based system. I used to. But I no longer support discrimination. On the other hand, when someone starts saying that my parents will come here and do nothing but consume resources and contribute nothing, I take offense to that. If you truly believe that to be the over riding concern then go support a merit based system. Otherwise please don't bring this up. You cannot have your cake and eat it.
Of course there are some contribution to the economy, and every sponsor/parents situation is unique. But looking at averages (so take a random sampling of 20K parents who immigrated in any given year), the total cost to all Canadians (solely in costs and wait times related to healthcare) of the PGP program will outweigh the economic benefits, strictly talking in dollars. And much of the economic benefit will really only affect the sponsor's own family (like getting free child care).

Canada has done cost studies on all their immigration programs to try and better understand economic and other social impacts. As well there are numerous cost studies done on average costs to healthcare for someone starting at the typical age of an immigrating parents (around 65) and over the remainder of their life. I highly doubt you could find more than a handful of cases where the actual dollar amount an immigrating parent generated for the Canadian economy as a whole, was greater than the dollar amount cost they incurred from the healthcare system.

Simply put parents program is H&C/Family reunification first, so it's pointless to argue if parents are contributing to or draining resources. Most importantly it makes Canadians happier that their own parents are living here with them, so is a good thing morally. As long as overall Canada can handle the cost with minimal impact to other Canadians, then the program should continue as-is with equal access to it for all that qualify.
 

nayr69sg

Champion Member
Apr 13, 2017
1,571
679
Of course there are some contribution to the economy, and every sponsor/parents situation is unique. But looking at averages (so take a random sampling of 20K parents who immigrated in any given year), the total cost to all Canadians (solely in costs and wait times related to healthcare) of the PGP program will outweigh the economic benefits, strictly talking in dollars. And much of the economic benefit will really only affect the sponsor's own family (like getting free child care).

Canada has done cost studies on all their immigration programs to try and better understand economic and other social impacts. As well there are numerous cost studies done on average costs to healthcare for someone starting at the typical age of an immigrating parents (around 65) and over the remainder of their life. I highly doubt you could find more than a handful of cases where the actual dollar amount an immigrating parent generated for the Canadian economy as a whole, was greater than the dollar amount cost they incurred from the healthcare system.
Handful because so far it has been a fairly random process. Calculations can be made such that we had a merit based system where Canada only took in immigrating parents who could generate a positive balance. We could. But for reasons we have agreed upon we don't want to.

Simply put parents program is H&C/Family reunification first, so it's pointless to argue if parents are contributing to or draining resources. Most importantly it makes Canadians happier that their own parents are living here with them, so is a good thing morally. As long as overall Canada can handle the cost with minimal impact to other Canadians, then the program should continue as-is with equal access to it for all that qualify.
I absolutely agree with you on this one.

So I hope people stop saying that PGP is a drain and how we tax payers have to pay and why should we pay and what not. We can and could have a merit based system such that only immigrating parents who can generate a positive balance are given PGP. But we don't want to discriminate. Hence we have to accept the lottery system and any tax payer dollars that go with the program.If you truly feel strongly against this expense by Canada, then by all means go support a merit based system.
 

nayr69sg

Champion Member
Apr 13, 2017
1,571
679
Strange how some of these people want to have petitions written up but disappear after a while. Spur of the moment kind of thing?
 

4parents

Full Member
Feb 11, 2018
26
4
If rich parents want to come and stay with their children in Canada, and want to pay for everything themselves, they are more than welcome to get supervisa! Why do they need PR? What advantage do they get over the 10 year visa?
When parents arrive on super-visa, the only thing they can do is basically stay at home, and if the child has kids - stay with kids. They cannot study and cannot work. Many people will die of boredom if they are not occupied by something meaningful. Depending on parents age the insurance may cost as low as $1500 per year, so in some cases it's quite affordable even for not-rich families.
Applying for study permit and work permit is super hard for them because of the age and often poor English, but many, if they had PR, would start their own small business to serve their own community.
For the above reasons long stays on super-visa is not an option for many, even if parents are relatively young and can afford the insurance fee for a few years.
 

4parents

Full Member
Feb 11, 2018
26
4
Parents are not exactly foreigners if they are soon to be permanent residents of Canada so as international students and other foreign workers.
Agree, parents are not exactly foreigners. But just to note, from the experience I see, once parents arrive (selling property in own country), they give money to the kids and kids buy property in their own name - this way the family avoids the transfer tax, but since the cost is same either way, just on the next transfer the family will owe more taxes, so eventually it does not matter, govt will always get their cut.

If people think they are hurting the economy, why don't they lower the number of people coming to Canada in the first place? Or if you like, the rent will go up.
Prices going up is a *good* thing for the economy - when done at moderate levels. But look at Toronto, there are so many professionals who want to live downtown, rent prices are skyrocketing. Yet, more skilled workers is a good thing for the economy.
 

4parents

Full Member
Feb 11, 2018
26
4
anyway where is 4parents? Where are you? You have nothing to say?
Strange how some of these people want to have petitions written up but disappear after a while. Spur of the moment kind of thing?
I was away just one day :) But thank you for noticing.
You will also notice I generally post only in the EST evenings - simply don't have much other time on hand
 
  • Like
Reactions: nayr69sg

4parents

Full Member
Feb 11, 2018
26
4
Could simply be a case of giving an extra lottery entry for each year one has applied but not been selected.
If someone has entered the lottery and failed for the past 10 years, on his 11th year he should have 11 entries to the lottery.
I think is a terrific idea, something very reasonable and (hopefully) easily doable by the govt.
Question:
IF this logic was introduced for 2019, should they do:
a) Ask people for their 2017 and 2018 lottery ticket numbers, and corresponding NOAs - so maximum number of entries will be 3 in 2019, or
b) Ask people to submit all previous NOAs, and calculate for how many years each person was eligible, and then give an additional ticket for each year.