CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
May 23, 2013, 08:58:59 am
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: 1 ... 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 [490] 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 ... 866   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Thread for outland Buffalo applicants!  (Read 565400 times)
doctorkb
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 360
Ratings: +10
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo, NY, USA
NOC Code......:
App. Filed.......: 03-JAN-2011
Doc's Request.: 12-SEP-2011 / e-mailed 20-SEP-2011
AOR Received.: 29-APR-2011
File Transfer...: 03-FEB-2011 / In Process 16-AUG-2011
Med's Done....: 29-SEP-2010
Interview........: (waived, get it?)
Passport Req..: 24-OCT-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 11-NOV-2011
LANDED..........: 07-DEC-2011

« Reply #7335 on: November 04, 2011, 07:08:46 pm »

My advice: do what we did and get legally married NOW, so you can start your paperwork and application ASAP, then worry about a nice, big family wedding later, take your time planning that AFTER you're done with your PR app (unless you don't want a big wedding at all).

This was my and my husband's plan. We got legally married at Toronto City Hall on Oct 1, 2010. We had our big wedding on Oct 1, 2011, and I'm still waiting on my PR status.  Cry We were hoping I'd be done and ready to move in with him right after the big wedding, but Buffalo thought otherwise. Siiiiigh.

I don't know that this is good advice, but I'm not certain.

Here's why.  While *I* don't doubt the validity of your marriage, CIC might.  A small civil ceremony is more likely to be a "marriage of convenience" than a big to-do affair.  They specifically ask who was invited to the wedding, whether there was a reception and they also want photos of the wedding and reception included.  I believe that these questions are there to validate the marriage.

If your relationship is sufficient to stand on its own (without the marriage certificate), then go for it.  But if you've had a short courtship / dating phase and haven't lived together long enough to be common-law, then I'd suggest making the wedding something that appears valid and not just something on paper to facilitate the immigration process.
Logged
doctorkb
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 360
Ratings: +10
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo, NY, USA
NOC Code......:
App. Filed.......: 03-JAN-2011
Doc's Request.: 12-SEP-2011 / e-mailed 20-SEP-2011
AOR Received.: 29-APR-2011
File Transfer...: 03-FEB-2011 / In Process 16-AUG-2011
Med's Done....: 29-SEP-2010
Interview........: (waived, get it?)
Passport Req..: 24-OCT-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 11-NOV-2011
LANDED..........: 07-DEC-2011

« Reply #7336 on: November 04, 2011, 07:11:44 pm »

Anyway we order GCMS note last month (oct) via mail but not sure about the actual date and will like to know what email id we should send the inquiry to as to when should be getting the Note or should we waiting until we receive it.

Call them.  The representative at the ATIP office told me specifically that they are pushing the 30 day timeframe fairly often, but if you call them after the 30 days, they expedite the processing of your request through a supervisor.

See the previous post with the infosource.gc.ca link for their phone number.
Logged
doctorkb
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 360
Ratings: +10
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo, NY, USA
NOC Code......:
App. Filed.......: 03-JAN-2011
Doc's Request.: 12-SEP-2011 / e-mailed 20-SEP-2011
AOR Received.: 29-APR-2011
File Transfer...: 03-FEB-2011 / In Process 16-AUG-2011
Med's Done....: 29-SEP-2010
Interview........: (waived, get it?)
Passport Req..: 24-OCT-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 11-NOV-2011
LANDED..........: 07-DEC-2011

« Reply #7337 on: November 04, 2011, 07:25:07 pm »

I don't believe that the USPS can give you an update, because it's out of country. I don't think the USPS and Canada Post work very well together (I've had a few items fall into the black pit of despair between the American and Canadian line), and I know for a fact that at Canada Post they will gladly tell you that you can pay extra to track your package to its U.S. destination even though once it hits the border their tracking system abruptly stops working. My guess is that it's the same thing for USPS. I think for tracking international shipping you really have to use Fedex or UPS. I know the office where I do some volunteer work uses Fedex to ship internationally and they get an email update once the package is delivered abroad.

Honestly, I've done a fair bit of cross-border shipping and find that CanadaPost/USPS is the best option most of the time (especially if you're going from the US to Canada).

That said, sometimes the tracking systems are out of sync.  You can use the same tracking number on Canadapost.ca as you use on USPS.com, once the parcel is in Canada.

As for delivery standards -- USPS and CanadaPost seem to work fairly well together on keeping those in line.  Also, UPS & Fedex charge HUGE brokerage fees -- USPS/CanadaPost *may* charge $5... but often doesn't even do that (let alone GST/HST, etc.)
Logged
doctorkb
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 360
Ratings: +10
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo, NY, USA
NOC Code......:
App. Filed.......: 03-JAN-2011
Doc's Request.: 12-SEP-2011 / e-mailed 20-SEP-2011
AOR Received.: 29-APR-2011
File Transfer...: 03-FEB-2011 / In Process 16-AUG-2011
Med's Done....: 29-SEP-2010
Interview........: (waived, get it?)
Passport Req..: 24-OCT-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 11-NOV-2011
LANDED..........: 07-DEC-2011

« Reply #7338 on: November 04, 2011, 07:33:20 pm »

Yeah, it all ultimately depends on who you get, but a 12 month visitor record is certainly not unheard of in this situation. I'd imagine that showing them the receipt for the immigration fees basically 'seals the deal' as far as implied status goes, because if you can prove you've paid $1040 to them in order to start the process, they ought to see that you're not screwing around with them. But still, it all depends on who you get.

Exactly.  There's no consistency.  Though, it does seem as though the front-line CBSA guys are much more ridiculous than the Immigration guys.

Quote
Indeed, they don't have to extend it. This is why I still maintain a residence in Michigan, and keep all my rent receipts, copies of bills, bank statements, etc.... I also go back and forth as per usual, knowing full well that they don't have to let me back in. Ultimately, aside from the paper which doesn't express, nor imply, any other special right or privilege, and the 'implied status' from us mailing in the immigration application, I'm no different than a regular visitor running across for a butter tart from a legal standpoint. Nevertheless, all these reasons (plus many more I haven't mentioned on this forum yet) are basically why I filed outland in the first place. Grin

There's no implied status for outland applicants.  Sorry! Smiley  Inland, yes, outland, no.

Quote
How could I have done an inland app, and still maintain a residence here, without risk of abandoning that app if they tell me 'you can't enter'? Or abandon my stuff just to stay in Canada to maintain the app, but then my grandfather dies and I have to head back into the States? Try coming back then with no proof of residence there still! Ouch! I've heard of a couple once (on the news, I think) whom the prospective immigrant was a Mexican woman, and they were doing the inland process. Once of her relatives died, and they had to go back to Mexico for the funeral. Upon reaching Canada, they refused her entry, because she had no ties back to Mexico, and so their inland app was tossed out along with all the fees that were paid for it!

Inland is a bit of a sham -- it's basically a way for out-of-status (illegal, using US terms) and soon-to-be-out-of-status applicants to stay in the country legally.  It also allows those who have found their way in without ties abroad to not risk being removed from the country.

The woman in question should have sent her best wishes to her family, but realised that this was a risk she took when applying inland.  I have little sympathy -- she knew the "rules" and chose one route, then complained when the rules actually didn't work in her favour.
Logged
prophet3
Star Member
****

Posts: 86
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buf
App. Filed.......: May 25
AOR Received.: June 29
File Transfer...: July 11

« Reply #7339 on: November 04, 2011, 10:44:02 pm »

Likely backlog.  Did you ask for anything else, like the medical file?

No just GSCM notes.
Logged
prophet3
Star Member
****

Posts: 86
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buf
App. Filed.......: May 25
AOR Received.: June 29
File Transfer...: July 11

« Reply #7340 on: November 04, 2011, 10:44:42 pm »

I got that same email when I requested my GCMS notes.Then within a couple days I got an email saying disregard the previous email It was a mistake In the system and heres your GCMS notes.So hopefully thats what happen with you also.

hope so,, Sad
Logged
prophet3
Star Member
****

Posts: 86
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buf
App. Filed.......: May 25
AOR Received.: June 29
File Transfer...: July 11

« Reply #7341 on: November 04, 2011, 10:49:39 pm »

I don't know that this is good advice, but I'm not certain.

Here's why.  While *I* don't doubt the validity of your marriage, CIC might.  A small civil ceremony is more likely to be a "marriage of convenience" than a big to-do affair.  They specifically ask who was invited to the wedding, whether there was a reception and they also want photos of the wedding and reception included.  I believe that these questions are there to validate the marriage.

If your relationship is sufficient to stand on its own (without the marriage certificate), then go for it.  But if you've had a short courtship / dating phase and haven't lived together long enough to be common-law, then I'd suggest making the wedding something that appears valid and not just something on paper to facilitate the immigration process.


Agreed!!!!
Logged
prophet3
Star Member
****

Posts: 86
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buf
App. Filed.......: May 25
AOR Received.: June 29
File Transfer...: July 11

« Reply #7342 on: November 04, 2011, 11:03:58 pm »

by the way parent and grandparent class is frozen for now, while spousal is not touched or capped ,,,
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20111104/two-year-moratorium-on-immigrant-families-111104/
Logged
jstnmlr
Full Member
***

Posts: 46
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: 10-05-2011
AOR Received.: 10-06-2011
File Transfer...: 09-06-2011
Med's Done....: 12-04-2011
Interview........: Waived
Passport Req..: 17-11-2011
VISA ISSUED...: ??
LANDED..........: planned Jan 20, 2012

« Reply #7343 on: November 04, 2011, 11:34:19 pm »

Hi everyone!  I am having trouble getting 2 photos for my husband to send with his PPR. Even though we had them done at Walmart  the measurement  from top of his head to his  chin is larger than is required for Canadian Speciications. Has anyone else have this problem and could you tell me where is a good place to get the photos done?  We are  living in PA. 
Thanks !

Ask around on Facebook or work friends. Most people have a photoshop pro friend and a picture taken on a plain white wall can easily be fit into specs in about 5 minutes. As someone else stated and pro/semi pro photographer can do this with their eyes closed. Places that do passport photos usually dont have the ability to do it because they can't adjust the measurements.
Logged


Immigration Photos made easy immigrationpics.info
mjh49783aa
Star Member
****

Posts: 178
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo, USA
App. Filed.......: 12-05-2011
Nomination.....: Sponsor approved: 13-06-2011
AOR Received.: 03-11-2011
File Transfer...: 28-06-2011
Interview........: waived
Passport Req..: 04-01-2012
VISA ISSUED...: COPR received 13-01-2012
LANDED..........: 15-01-2012

« Reply #7344 on: November 05, 2011, 12:37:47 am »

Exactly.  There's no consistency.  Though, it does seem as though the front-line CBSA guys are much more ridiculous than the Immigration guys.
Can't argue with that.  Wink
I haven't had too many problems with the CBSA guys at the Sault Ste. Marie post, but the Sarnia post? Holy cow can they be mean! I'd recommend getting a NEXUS card to cross there just to save a lot of grief!
There's no implied status for outland applicants.  Sorry! Smiley  Inland, yes, outland, no.
I think I meant to say 'dual intent' here. My bad.  Shocked
Inland is a bit of a sham -- it's basically a way for out-of-status (illegal, using US terms) and soon-to-be-out-of-status applicants to stay in the country legally.  It also allows those who have found their way in without ties abroad to not risk being removed from the country.

The woman in question should have sent her best wishes to her family, but realised that this was a risk she took when applying inland.  I have little sympathy -- she knew the "rules" and chose one route, then complained when the rules actually didn't work in her favour.
Yeah, I'd have enough sympathy to say 'sorry', but not much more. They clearly state when doing the inland app not to leave Canada while the app is in process. Besides, one can stay in Canada while doing the outland route anyway. I don't think it would've mattered anyway if she broke ties with Mexico as that would violate her visitor status, but at least her app would've still gone forward. Oh well.

On a side note, the DMP where I got my medical done seemed pretty confused when I went in with my Appendix C. I ended up having to go back to the photographer twice to get immigration pictures done, and come to find out, almost all the immigration medical exams this guy does is for the inland process, and because of that, the people there were pretty confused at first. I guess a whole lot of people buy into this sham from the sounds of it. But it wasn't for me.
Logged
cbennett
Star Member
****

Posts: 62
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
Job Offer........: Yes
App. Filed.......: 4.18.11
AOR Received.: 8.06.11
File Transfer...: 6.06.11
Med's Done....: 3.30.11
Interview........: waived 9.30.11
Passport Req..: 11.7.11
VISA ISSUED...: 11.17.11
LANDED..........: 11.17.11

« Reply #7345 on: November 05, 2011, 06:05:13 am »

Sigh. My address just disappeared for the third time now on ECAS.  What's going on?
Logged
gypsy494
Star Member
****

Posts: 114
Ratings: +1
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: 05-11-2011
AOR Received.: 08-11-2011
File Transfer...: 24-01-2012
Med's Done....: 12-10-2011
Interview........: WAIVED
Passport Req..: 21-03-2012
VISA ISSUED...: 23-04-2012
LANDED..........: 24-04-2012

« Reply #7346 on: November 05, 2011, 07:41:15 am »

ddobro2 to the rescue!!!!

Thank you I am off to mail/courier address Cheesy

Have a great weekend all!
Logged

To love is to share life together
to build special plans just for two
then smile with pride
as one by one, dreams all come true.
At Last
ddobro2
Champion Member
******

Posts: 2589
Ratings: +38
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo, NY

« Reply #7347 on: November 05, 2011, 08:58:23 am »

Lol, no problem. Congrats on getting that thing done and mailed off  Smiley
ddobro2 to the rescue!!!!

Thank you I am off to mail/courier address Cheesy

Have a great weekend all!
Logged

8 months, 1 week, and 6 days from application filed to PPR

Landed February 11, 2012

All recent Buffalo applicants spreadsheet: http://tinyurl.com/3rpdwav
jayde
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 265
Ratings: +8
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: 24-3-2011
File Transfer...: 03-05-2011
Med's Done....: 03-01-2011
Interview........: waived
Passport Req..: 06-10-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 27-10-2011
LANDED..........: 04-11-2011  WOO HOO!!!

« Reply #7348 on: November 05, 2011, 10:20:52 am »

So we've been tracking my husband's passport which left Fort Erie on Wednesday.  The post office said there was ZERO chance that we'd get it yesterday but suddenly the tracker said it was delivered!  Checked the mail and there it was!  So we decided right then to drive to the border.  We left within half an hour and my husband landed last night around 8:30!!

So thankful this is over for us, and hopeful for speedy processes for everyone else, especially for those who have been waiting longer than I did.

woo hoo Smiley
Logged

Daisypath Vacation tickers
scylla
VIP Member
*******

Posts: 9188
Ratings: +216
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: 28-05-2010
AOR Received.: 19-08-2010
File Transfer...: 28-06-2010
Passport Req..: 01-10-2010
VISA ISSUED...: 05-10-2010
LANDED..........: 05-10-2010

« Reply #7349 on: November 05, 2011, 10:34:17 am »

So we've been tracking my husband's passport which left Fort Erie on Wednesday.  The post office said there was ZERO chance that we'd get it yesterday but suddenly the tracker said it was delivered!  Checked the mail and there it was!  So we decided right then to drive to the border.  We left within half an hour and my husband landed last night around 8:30!!

So thankful this is over for us, and hopeful for speedy processes for everyone else, especially for those who have been waiting longer than I did.

woo hoo Smiley

Congrats!!! Must feel great! Cheesy
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 [490] 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 ... 866   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC