Thread 1111 and 0111 who have submitted docs in delhi CHC Only 2010

[OHMYGOD]

Give me your Bank info and if its a CBS Branch I will Let you know your account balance and last transaction same time tomorrow
I dont think you are 0111 or 1111 applicant otherwise you would have known hows things works

remember we dont have a swiss banking system

I am  totally agree with you bro.  bank certificate or statement is enough.  second thing is that they can never check your fund. Bank will never answer about the funds because of privacy. that is the reason we are sending original statement or certificate copy to them.

We need to send them update regarding the Change of the status. means if we change the address or family member addition.

( if your Employer's mobile number will change what will you do.  will you send the update to CHC everytime.?)

[OHMYGOD]

change in address will be termed as.................

change in Job will be termed as................

change in No of family dependents will be termed as ................

we dont need to inform in any of the cases  , cause life cannot stop ,can it

and wonder why  "hasib " informed Vo after he changed funds and Location

 

The circumstances are 'change in status' and not 'funds'.
I don't know anyone who got rejected because of insufficient funds.
If you know anyone than please let us know.

Another thing is that, the time that CHC gave us has certainly increased from 8 months to 18 months or more.
Does that mean our funds will be held up for that period. Our life must go on as usual.
As long as the money is ours there should not be any problem...

[destinationBC]

easy easy bro easy

he advised what sounded convenient according to him. His Point of view was more of an argument and less of and advice

lets not be Indulgent

relax   

change in address will be termed as.................

change in Job will be termed as................

change in No of family dependents will be termed as ................

we dont need to inform in any of the cases  , cause life cannot stop ,can it

and wonder why  "hasib " informed Vo after he changed funds and Location

 

[nano24482]

If I hurt your sentiments than I am sorry.
What I meant by change in status was a change in family composition, job, change in address, etc

Btw I did all the three of the above and informed CHC ND.

Regarding the proof of funds, my point of argument was that little bit of change in funds won't matter much.
For eg If I have 5 lakh(11000 CAD Approx) in my bank account and transfer some amount lets say 50,000 INR in mutual fund than it won't create much problem.

My point of argument is just that the CHC has given us certain commitment as to when they will process our application. They did not honoured it, does that mean we will keep our funds on hold???

And honestly I did not know anyone who got rejected because of lack of funds.

Btw you people are financiers and accountants, so you will know better..   

change in address will be termed as.................

change in Job will be termed as................

change in No of family dependents will be termed as ................

we dont need to inform in any of the cases  , cause life cannot stop ,can it

and wonder why  "hasib " informed Vo after he changed funds and Location

 

[anil_india]

if your file is In Process or not,,,,,,,,pls do not send any document, until NDVO directs you to send.

reg. funds, a change of 20-30% is OKAY!

they needed the funds balance when we sent 'full application' , we did it.
==============

now, if they instruct us to prove it, then show the same balance again.

this particular issue can be managed well, by the applicant, easily.

[globalsc]

if your file is In Process or not,,,,,,,,pls do not send any document, until NDVO directs you to send.

reg. funds, a change of 20-30% is OKAY!

they needed the funds balance when we sent 'full application' , we did it.
==============

now, if they instruct us to prove it, then show the same balance again.

this particular issue can be managed well, by the applicant, easily.

Right Anil ji
CHC ND clearly mentioned in the email msg, send to me on 2nd of March, not to send any documents at this stage unless specifically asked. At least all documents as per CHC N delhi checklist should be in order at the time of full documents  to Visa Office "Baki ta Rabb Rakha"

[OHMYGOD]

OTTAWA - Canada will consider legislating away its massive backlog of immigration applications and allowing provinces to cherry-pick from one big pool of would-be newcomers in a bid to transform Canada's immigration system into one that's driven by the economy, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said Wednesday.

In a speech to business leaders at an Economic Club of Canada luncheon, Kenney promised ``transformational change'' to immigration that emphasizes the need for skilled newcomers who can fill gaps in the country's labour market.

He suggested the pre-2008 backlog of nearly one million applications is bogging down the system and hindering reforms and outlined several pilot projects and strategies the government is considering to eliminate it.

``The time has come for fundamental change to our rigid, slow-moving immigration process and this government will deliver that change,'' he said.

``People with flexible human capital, high levels of language proficiency and a prearranged job are set for success so that will be an important guidepost as we move toward transformational change.''

Noting New Zealand ``legislated an end'' to its backlog in 2003 by creating a ``pool'' from which all applicants could be selected based on specific criteria as opposed to time spent in the queue, Kenney said Canada is looking at a similar option.

Meanwhile, a new pilot project, he said, is now in place to give provinces the opportunity to ``mine the backlog'' for newcomers who meet local labour force needs.

The federal government has already struck deals with British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador and the Northwest Territories to sort through the backlogs. Officials predict that will allow Canada to welcome an additional 3,000-4,000 newcomers this year through the provincial nominee program which gives the provinces and territories a greater say in immigrant selection.

Kenney said applicants ``stuck'' in the backlog are also being urged to pull their applications and consider re-applying through the much faster provincial nominee program.

Furthermore, high level consultations began last week between government officials and employers across the country to discuss ways of creating a more ``active'' immigration system in which employers play a greater role in recruiting people from abroad.

Kenney said the government is looking at obtaining consent from applicants in the backlog so they might be considered directly by Canadian employers who are looking for particular skilled workers. It would mean giving employers direct access to the backlog database so, for example, hospitals in Manitoba can find foreign doctors and nurses who've said they'd like to settle in the region.

``Employers are best positioned to decide who can best fill the open jobs rather than a passive and bureaucratic system,'' Kenney said, dismissing the idea that such an initiative could give the private sector too much power at the expense of the federal government.

``It's not about privatizing the immigration system, it's about a more active role of recruitment for people so they have jobs when they show up. I'd rather have an engineer working as an engineer than as a cab driver. That's really where we're trying to go with this.''

NDP immigration critic Don Davies said credential recognition is a ``large barrier'' to immigrant success and that the government should think about doing more to tackle that issue. He's also disappointed that Kenney never mentioned non-economic, but such equally important immigration streams as the family and refugee class.

He suggested the 25-year-old Chinese engineer with a strong command of the English language might not want to move to Canada if he thinks he'll have trouble bringing his widowed mother to the country 20 years down the road.

``These immigration streams are connected and I didn't hear that connection being made by the minister,'' he said.

He favours tackling the application backlog by accepting more immigrants on an annual basis and while not entirely against all the measures the government has proposed, he has grave concerns about the overall direction the Conservatives are headed and believes it may be time for a national debate.

``There's two very different visions of immigration in this country. One is the Statue of Liberty: give me your poor, your oppressed, your weak and tired, yearning for freedom. That's what built the U.S. and Canada. It wasn't give me your rich, give me your educated, give me your wealthy investors,'' he said.

``I think this transformation is moving more toward the latter and I think we need to have a healthy Canadian debate about that because I'm not so sure that's the way to build your economy.''

[destinationBC]

what are the negativities  of sending additional docs if they add value to your case

Right Anil ji
CHC ND clearly mentioned in the email msg, send to me on 2nd of March, not to send any documents at this stage unless specifically asked. At least all documents as per CHC N delhi checklist should be in order at the time of full documents  to Visa Office "Baki ta Rabb Rakha"

[anil_india]

what are the negativities  of sending additional docs if they add value to your case

1. we r not experts in deciding if so and so Doc will support

2. this may make them suspicious in some sense.....what if they take it otherwise.
yes, sending improved TRF (ielts) or a change of address, family, a new college degree ought to be sent.

3. will delay the processing, another BFD

4. God knows more or the Visa officers.

[Ank]

what are the negativities  of sending additional docs if they add value to your case

hi DBC ankur here

i m pre june applicent 2nd AOR aug 10, NDVO

i just want to ask u that those who got line added like me and u when we expect medical???

ank

[destinationBC]

Hi Ank

Do you have a Processing date on your e status if Yes then wait for 9 to 10 weeks from the processing date

dbc

hi DBC ankur here

i m pre june applicent 2nd AOR aug 10, NDVO

i just want to ask u that those who got line added like me and u when we expect medical???

ank

[Ank]

Hi Ank

Do you have a Processing date on your e status if Yes then wait for 9 to 10 weeks from the processing date

dbc

yes i do have processing date in 1st weak of feb-2012

when i can expect.

acctuly i want to tock to u if possible

i need ur cell no

[nano24482]

Expect in March End or early April, though nothing can be said.
Better order a CAIPS for clear picture.

Please do not mind my suggestion, but work on your english language skills...

yes i do have processing date in 1st weak of feb-2012

when i can expect.

acctuly i want to tock to u if possible

i need ur cell no

[OHMYGOD]

Sure Hope this comes true

Hi Ank

Do you have a Processing date on your e status if Yes then wait for 9 to 10 weeks from the processing date

dbc

[destinationBC]

where did you get this

OTTAWA - Canada will consider legislating away its massive backlog of immigration applications and allowing provinces to cherry-pick from one big pool of would-be newcomers in a bid to transform Canada's immigration system into one that's driven by the economy, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said Wednesday.

In a speech to business leaders at an Economic Club of Canada luncheon, Kenney promised ``transformational change'' to immigration that emphasizes the need for skilled newcomers who can fill gaps in the country's labour market.

He suggested the pre-2008 backlog of nearly one million applications is bogging down the system and hindering reforms and outlined several pilot projects and strategies the government is considering to eliminate it.

``The time has come for fundamental change to our rigid, slow-moving immigration process and this government will deliver that change,'' he said.

``People with flexible human capital, high levels of language proficiency and a prearranged job are set for success so that will be an important guidepost as we move toward transformational change.''

Noting New Zealand ``legislated an end'' to its backlog in 2003 by creating a ``pool'' from which all applicants could be selected based on specific criteria as opposed to time spent in the queue, Kenney said Canada is looking at a similar option.

Meanwhile, a new pilot project, he said, is now in place to give provinces the opportunity to ``mine the backlog'' for newcomers who meet local labour force needs.

The federal government has already struck deals with British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador and the Northwest Territories to sort through the backlogs. Officials predict that will allow Canada to welcome an additional 3,000-4,000 newcomers this year through the provincial nominee program which gives the provinces and territories a greater say in immigrant selection.

Kenney said applicants ``stuck'' in the backlog are also being urged to pull their applications and consider re-applying through the much faster provincial nominee program.

Furthermore, high level consultations began last week between government officials and employers across the country to discuss ways of creating a more ``active'' immigration system in which employers play a greater role in recruiting people from abroad.

Kenney said the government is looking at obtaining consent from applicants in the backlog so they might be considered directly by Canadian employers who are looking for particular skilled workers. It would mean giving employers direct access to the backlog database so, for example, hospitals in Manitoba can find foreign doctors and nurses who've said they'd like to settle in the region.

``Employers are best positioned to decide who can best fill the open jobs rather than a passive and bureaucratic system,'' Kenney said, dismissing the idea that such an initiative could give the private sector too much power at the expense of the federal government.

``It's not about privatizing the immigration system, it's about a more active role of recruitment for people so they have jobs when they show up. I'd rather have an engineer working as an engineer than as a cab driver. That's really where we're trying to go with this.''

NDP immigration critic Don Davies said credential recognition is a ``large barrier'' to immigrant success and that the government should think about doing more to tackle that issue. He's also disappointed that Kenney never mentioned non-economic, but such equally important immigration streams as the family and refugee class.

He suggested the 25-year-old Chinese engineer with a strong command of the English language might not want to move to Canada if he thinks he'll have trouble bringing his widowed mother to the country 20 years down the road.

``These immigration streams are connected and I didn't hear that connection being made by the minister,'' he said.

He favours tackling the application backlog by accepting more immigrants on an annual basis and while not entirely against all the measures the government has proposed, he has grave concerns about the overall direction the Conservatives are headed and believes it may be time for a national debate.

``There's two very different visions of immigration in this country. One is the Statue of Liberty: give me your poor, your oppressed, your weak and tired, yearning for freedom. That's what built the U.S. and Canada. It wasn't give me your rich, give me your educated, give me your wealthy investors,'' he said.

``I think this transformation is moving more toward the latter and I think we need to have a healthy Canadian debate about that because I'm not so sure that's the way to build your economy.''