Spreadsheet for PreJunes of New Delhi VO having "In Process with Date"

[nano24482]

Dear Ind2ca,

Inform the CHC ND immediately regarding your wife's pregnancy by sending a letter or fax along with a letter/certificate from gynecologist indicating the tentative date of birth.
It won't matter if you get medicals now or later as no further processing will be done until your wife undergoes medical.

Do not forget to update proof of funds.
Regards,

Dear nano,
Kindly assist me with this.
My 'In process' date is in January, 2012 and b'fd in the month if May, 2012. I had applied for myself, my wife and our daughter who is 4 years old now. We are expecting our second child later this year. A have not yet informed CIC regarding my wife's pregnancy. (I would be informing them soon). My question is, now that we were expecting to get call for our medical examination from CIC, since my wife is pregnant, so she would not be asked to undergo medical examination till her delivery. Does this mean that MY medicals would also be delayed? Or is it possible for me to undergo my medicals and once she delivers, then we can get my wife's medicals after we get my second child's name entered in the application - by the end of this year?
Kindly help me with this.
Waiting for a reply from your end.
Thanks.

[Ind2ca]

Dear Ind2ca,

Inform the CHC ND immediately regarding your wife's pregnancy by sending a letter or fax along with a letter/certificate from gynecologist indicating the tentative date of birth.
It won't matter if you get medicals now or later as no further processing will be done until your wife undergoes medical.

Do not forget to update proof of funds.
Regards,

Thanks for the prompt reply.
I'll do the needful, as suggested by you. Thanks. :-)

[lokoloko0]

Now what is this..... (another announcement by immigration minister)

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/speeches/2012/2012-04-17.asp?utm_source=media-centre-email&utm_medium=email-eng&utm_campaign=generic

"Secondly, we will be bringing forward legislation that allows the government to retroactively apply regulations for the selection of immigrants to those who are already in the queue. This means, for example, that as we reform the points grid for the selection of skilled workers to put more emphasis on language proficiency for those who want to work in licensed professions, to put more emphasis on younger workers who we know succeed better over time in Canada, to put more emphasis on Canadian as opposed to foreign work experience, we will be able to apply those criteria to those who are already in the queue".

Why don't he just refuse all previous applications in simple words 

[nano24482]

What are these guys upto??
I just want my case to be over with.

Aar ya paar!!!
Not somewhere stuck in the middle.

Now what is this..... (another announcement by immigration minister)

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/speeches/2012/2012-04-17.asp?utm_source=media-centre-email&utm_medium=email-eng&utm_campaign=generic

"Secondly, we will be bringing forward legislation that allows the government to retroactively apply regulations for the selection of immigrants to those who are already in the queue. This means, for example, that as we reform the points grid for the selection of skilled workers to put more emphasis on language proficiency for those who want to work in licensed professions, to put more emphasis on younger workers who we know succeed better over time in Canada, to put more emphasis on Canadian as opposed to foreign work experience, we will be able to apply those criteria to those who are already in the queue".

Why don't he just refuse all previous applications in simple words 

[canlove]

Now what is this..... (another announcement by immigration minister)

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/speeches/2012/2012-04-17.asp?utm_source=media-centre-email&utm_medium=email-eng&utm_campaign=generic

"Secondly, we will be bringing forward legislation that allows the government to retroactively apply regulations for the selection of immigrants to those who are already in the queue. This means, for example, that as we reform the points grid for the selection of skilled workers to put more emphasis on language proficiency for those who want to work in licensed professions, to put more emphasis on younger workers who we know succeed better over time in Canada, to put more emphasis on Canadian as opposed to foreign work experience, we will be able to apply those criteria to those who are already in the queue".

Why don't he just refuse all previous applications in simple words 

Earlier they legislated the pre feb applications and now they have found another way to eliminate backlog of MIs.

Cant they simply tell us what they actually want.

[Amri24]

What are these guys upto??
I just want my case to be over with.

Aar ya paar!!!
Not somewhere stuck in the middle.

I reciprocate ur setiments.... let this just be over and done with.... this phase of not knowing is the worst...!!!

[destinationBC]

Whats negative in this speech

First he wants Doctors first then other ,How many doctors have applied 1K 2 K let them travel first the what,
we will fill the remaining quota

second English

How are you effected you are not planning to open a Clinic,C A Office etc

Quote " for example, that as we reform the points grid for the selection of skilled workers to put more emphasis on language proficiency for those who want to work in licensed professions, to put more emphasis on younger workers who we know succeed better over time in Canada, to put more emphasis on Canadian as opposed to foreign work experience, we will be able to apply those criteria to those who are already in the queue". Un Quote

Third

I Think This is good news , No matter what the Period of being in a Limbo will be soon Over

We are moving, in this Economic Action Plan, to deal decisively with that backlog by returning three-quarters of the applications in our system, so we can start fresh with a clean slate, with a just-in-time immigration system. By 2014,

What are these guys upto??
I just want my case to be over with.

Aar ya paar!!!
Not somewhere stuck in the middle.

[nano24482]

While it is good that our backlog cases maybe over by 2013/2014, but what one realizes from this speech is that the ministerial instructions may change giving emphasis on

1. Canadian Work Experience
2. Age
3. Profession/NOC

And no-one can predict the NOC priority. Everyone can look into the hrsdc website and see that the graph is positive for their occupation, but fail to realise that it is positive for 99% of occupations.
Secondly it doesn't matter if all occupations are positive as long as the demand is fullfilled by canadians, a particular NOC features in the in-demand list only when those occupations cannot be fullfilled by locals.
This is the reason canpr got his medical request and we did not.

Anyways I think this will be good for all applicants under 30/35(as they can pay maximum tax by the virtue of their long employment in whatever field), those whose NOC are still featured in the in demand list(I am tradesperson so no worries for me), those who have canadian ties or experience(i don't have any Canadian experience, but my husband is doing PHD there).

Whats negative in this speech

First he wants Doctors first then other ,How many doctors have applied 1K 2 K let them travel first the what,
we will fill the remaining quota

second English

How are you effected you are not planning to open a Clinic,C A Office etc

Quote " for example, that as we reform the points grid for the selection of skilled workers to put more emphasis on language proficiency for those who want to work in licensed professions, to put more emphasis on younger workers who we know succeed better over time in Canada, to put more emphasis on Canadian as opposed to foreign work experience, we will be able to apply those criteria to those who are already in the queue". Un Quote

Third

I Think This is good news , No matter what the Period of being in a Limbo will be soon Over

We are moving, in this Economic Action Plan, to deal decisively with that backlog by returning three-quarters of the applications in our system, so we can start fresh with a clean slate, with a just-in-time immigration system. By 2014,

[lokoloko0]

Dear that is just one example... bad news is.... they ought to apply ALL new regulations to the previous applications, be it education evaluation, language proficiency, points grid and so on.

This is what I understand from his speech.

For example, it also means if a doctor (or previous applicant of any other occupation) who has got overall 7 bands in IELTS, but only 6 bands in speaking, will be in trouble if they say that the doctors will now have to score 7 bands each in speaking, listening, reading & writing.


There can be n number of new regulations which all will become applicable to the old applications also.

[nano24482]

Dear lokoloko0,

We cannot say its a bad news for all applications.
What if you are the perfect candidate??

Dear that is just one example... bad news is.... they ought to apply ALL new regulations to the previous applications, be it education evaluation, language proficiency, points grid and so on.

This is what I understand from his speech.

For example, it also means if a doctor (or previous applicant of any other occupation) who has got overall 7 bands in IELTS, but only 6 bands in speaking, will be in trouble if they say that the doctors will now have to score 7 bands each in speaking, listening, reading & writing.


There can be n number of new regulations which all will become applicable to the old applications also.

[sokhi2010]

Confusions galore....

As far as  language proficiency is concerned, I think those from the sub continent fare much better than their counterparts in Europe and quite often the USA / Canada.Our English is quite phenomenal.So if a person gets 7 Bands overall and 6 in speaking does not prove that he is weak in English. The understood criteria should be that one should know English and be able to explain his thoughts across, thats it. He qualifies.All of us are not expected to be Phd's in English.

A recruiter can change the laws to suit his needs AND NOT OURS. And ofcourse, as far as our applications are concerned, one can only hope that new laws do not force us into hibernation.

[lokoloko0]

Confusions galore....

As far as  language proficiency is concerned, I think those from the sub continent fare much better than their counterparts in Europe and quite often the USA / Canada.Our English is quite phenomenal.So if a person gets 7 Bands overall and 6 in speaking does not prove that he is weak in English. The understood criteria should be that one should know English and be able to explain his thoughts across, thats it. He qualifies.All of us are not expected to be Phd's in English.

A recruiter can change the laws to suit his needs AND NOT OURS. And ofcourse, as far as our applications are concerned, one can only hope that new laws do not force us into hibernation.

1. The reason why I mentioned about the individual scores in listening, reading etc. is because in many regulated professions, in order to get the licence, one has to get such scores in IELTS. Hence they may impose such conditions right from the begining. That was just an example. Nobody knows how many and what kinds of new regulations would be introduced. And if we (old applicants) do not fit into the new frame, may be thrown out right away.

2. Occupations on new demand list will be given priority..... and that also means the probable hibernation of those who are not on the list.

[lokoloko0]

Dear lokoloko0,

We cannot say its a bad news for all applications.
What if you are the perfect candidate??

How many of us would be? considering the phenomenal new changes that are to be introduced this year.

[lokoloko0]

Imposing the new regulations RETROACTIVELY to the previous applications in queue.... in itself.... is a big reason to worry.

We were eligible when we applied and now ..... who knows?

I think this is a great injustice.

It also means that the minister has really gone crazy now.

[nano24482]

You are right in this respect.
You are in nursing which is regulated profession.
If your score is less than it may affect the speed and even the final outcome of your applicaiton.

I hope your score is good. If it is the case than you may jump ahead of so many of applicaitons.
I'll pray for you.

Imposing the new regulations RETROACTIVELY to the previous applications in queue.... in itself.... is a big reason to worry.

We were eligible when we applied and now ..... who knows?

I think this is a great injustice.

It also means that the minister has really gone crazy now.