toby
Champion Member
     
Posts: 1649
Ratings: +85
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Hong Kong
App. Filed.......: November 2009
Med's Done....: October 2009 and 15 April 2011
Interview........: 4 April 2011
Passport Req..: 4 April 2011
VISA ISSUED...: 7 July 2011
LANDED..........: 15 July 2011
|
 |
« on: June 17, 2011, 11:43:53 pm » |
|
Many applications for a temporary visa (TRV) to Canada are rejected because the applicants don't have bonds strong enough to make them return to the home country.
The form letter of refusal from Canada also advises against re-applying unless the applicant has some new evidence. Since most applicants have done the best job they can with the first application, and have no new evidence to offer, so they give up.
An acquaintance who works wit VOs in a Canadian embassy has a different take on this: apparently it CAN be useful to immediately re-apply, with the same application and same evidence. Here`s why.
The average VO has something like 45 seconds to assess each application for a TRV. Why so many applications? Partly because travel agencies will submit multiple applications for a single client to many countries, hoping for at least one approval out of the many refusals.
So the overworked VO will routinely refuse applications unless there is a compelling reason to approve. But if the applicant re-submits, challenging the VO's reasoning in a cover letter, but essentially drawing the VO's attention to the strong evidence already presented in the original application, then the VO has to pay more serious attention, and the chances of approval rise significantly. Essentially the applicant is taking his application out of the big pile of applications in the first in-basket and putting it in the smaller pile for special VO consideration.
At least that's what my “insider source” says. So, if you want a TRV, apply early, giving yourself enough time to re-apply. If you really want to make the best case, give yourself time to get the CAIPS notes after the first refusal, then address those VO concerns in the new cover letter.
As a closing thought / question, I wonder if it would improve chances of approval if in the first cover letter you were to state that you are applying so far in advance of the travel date precisely to give yourself time to get the CAIPS notes, rebut, and re-apply
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nov 09 Application to Mississauga Nov 09 Approved; sent to Hong Kong. Interview April 4, 2011 (so slow!!). Passed. 15 April 2011 New medical done. 7 July 2011 COPR received. 15 July 2011 landed in Vancouver. At last.
|
|
|
tthordarson
Newbie

Posts: 7
Ratings: +0
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2011, 09:09:43 pm » |
|
Thank you Toby for sharing this with us.
It's totally ridiculous that the Canadian government doesn't want to provide enough resources so every application gets more than 45 seconds of consideration for the $75 that a submitted TRV application costs before it's decided to reject it. It's totally unfair.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
toby
Champion Member
     
Posts: 1649
Ratings: +85
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Hong Kong
App. Filed.......: November 2009
Med's Done....: October 2009 and 15 April 2011
Interview........: 4 April 2011
Passport Req..: 4 April 2011
VISA ISSUED...: 7 July 2011
LANDED..........: 15 July 2011
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2011, 11:04:50 pm » |
|
The fee helps pay for the parties and expenses of the embassy.
Really, embassies cost a lot of money. What benefits do they provide Canadians abroad?
They do offer a commercial support to businessmen. They do provide passports and visas. But this is all, as far as I can see, and these services could be provided MUCH more efficiently and cheaply with small offices, rather than by lavish embassies.
And when you ask an embassy for help, they seem irritated that you have the nerve!! Clearly they see their role and something other than serving the Canadian public. Employees seem more interested in getting invited to the next glamorous party, or getting the next promotion!
If I were King of Canada for a day, I'd adopt the approach of New Zealand a few decades ago, when they had too much dead wood in their bureaucracy, and was on the edge of bankruptcy. They Minister of Finance basically fired all bureaucrats on a Friday, and on the next Monday asked every one to reapply for the job by answering three questions: :
1) The job you do, does it need to be done? If the bureaucrat could not justify the job, could not show that it was useful to the taxpaying public, he/she didn't get hired back.
2) If the job is necessary, who should do it? If the bureaucrat could not show that it needed to be dome by government, not the private sector, he did not get hired back.
3) Who should pay for it? That is, if the job should be done by government, how should users pay for the service: through taxes or out of pocket (user pay)? By that means, New Zealand reduced an overburdening bureaucracy substantially, and this measure helped stave off bankruptcy in the late 1980's. Canada went through a spate of cost reduction in the late 1990's, but did not cut deeply enough to judge by the embassies.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nov 09 Application to Mississauga Nov 09 Approved; sent to Hong Kong. Interview April 4, 2011 (so slow!!). Passed. 15 April 2011 New medical done. 7 July 2011 COPR received. 15 July 2011 landed in Vancouver. At last.
|
|
|
tthordarson
Newbie

Posts: 7
Ratings: +0
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2011, 02:41:47 am » |
|
The fee helps pay for the parties and expenses of the embassy.
Really, embassies cost a lot of money. What benefits do they provide Canadians abroad?
They do offer a commercial support to businessmen. They do provide passports and visas. But this is all, as far as I can see, and these services could be provided MUCH more efficiently and cheaply with small offices, rather than by lavish embassies.
And when you ask an embassy for help, they seem irritated that you have the nerve!! Clearly they see their role and something other than serving the Canadian public. Employees seem more interested in getting invited to the next glamorous party, or getting the next promotion!
If I were King of Canada for a day, I'd adopt the approach of New Zealand a few decades ago, when they had too much dead wood in their bureaucracy, and was on the edge of bankruptcy. They Minister of Finance basically fired all bureaucrats on a Friday, and on the next Monday asked every one to reapply for the job by answering three questions: :
1) The job you do, does it need to be done? If the bureaucrat could not justify the job, could not show that it was useful to the taxpaying public, he/she didn't get hired back.
2) If the job is necessary, who should do it? If the bureaucrat could not show that it needed to be dome by government, not the private sector, he did not get hired back.
3) Who should pay for it? That is, if the job should be done by government, how should users pay for the service: through taxes or out of pocket (user pay)? By that means, New Zealand reduced an overburdening bureaucracy substantially, and this measure helped stave off bankruptcy in the late 1980's. Canada went through a spate of cost reduction in the late 1990's, but did not cut deeply enough to judge by the embassies.
I agree with everything you said. I'm from Iceland and we have relatively small embassies wherever we can have any. Usually we share buildings with other embassies(mainly the Scandinavian ones) and in cases consular services are needed for Iceland where there are no embassies, other Scandinavian embassies provide them on Iceland's behalf. In the past years before I ever needed to travel anywhere where visa was required I had only needed consular services every now and then from the Icelandic embassies, they answer the phone, they are polite and helpful and they are accessible. Once I had to deal with a Canadian embassy to come here, I was shocked at how limited access to it was and the lack of assistance(or shall I say NON-EXISTING) there was for visa applications. I don't know exactly if I want to make you a king(as I don't know all your views) but you surely may become foreign relations dictator 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
itscoezy
Hero Member
   
Posts: 374
Ratings: +6
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Mexico City
Job Offer........: Yes
App. Filed.......: 09-05-2012
Med's Done....: 10-04-2012
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2011, 02:50:47 am » |
|
Thanks for the insight. Has anyone tried this?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wants2bw/myhubbysoon
Star Member
   
Posts: 163
Ratings: +3
Visa Office......: Manila
App. Filed.......: June 22, 2011
AOR Received.: Sept 5, 2011
Med's Done....: 30-05-2011
Interview........: N/A
Passport Req..: Passport Sent - Sept 8, 2011, DM: Sept 26, 2011
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2011, 03:40:36 am » |
|
Thanks for the insight. Has anyone tried this?
Hi! I have tried this hoping that I would be able to go to Canada after our wedding. I applied twice and got rejected twice. We resent our application 1 month after the first rejection. We've shown them bank accounts and told them that I have a job and business here that I cant just leave for life. And that is really our plan (we will just spend spring and summer in Canada and return back to my country by the end of summer). But I think because my husband is a Canadian citizen, they did not believe that. Now, we are applying for a permanent visa and hoping to get a positive response from them soon. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Delight yourself in the Lord and He will give you the desires of your heart.
|
|
|
itscoezy
Hero Member
   
Posts: 374
Ratings: +6
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Mexico City
Job Offer........: Yes
App. Filed.......: 09-05-2012
Med's Done....: 10-04-2012
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2011, 04:36:37 pm » |
|
Hi! I have tried this hoping that I would be able to go to Canada after our wedding. I applied twice and got rejected twice. We resent our application 1 month after the first rejection. We've shown them bank accounts and told them that I have a job and business here that I cant just leave for life. And that is really our plan (we will just spend spring and summer in Canada and return back to my country by the end of summer). But I think because my husband is a Canadian citizen, they did not believe that. Now, we are applying for a permanent visa and hoping to get a positive response from them soon.  Goodluck! We just mailed our second application today after it was refused. I am in a similar situation. My boyfriend is Mexican, I'm Canadian. We both live in Mexico but he's getting refused to go to Canada to meet my family. Goodluck to you, hope everything works out with PR
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
steaky
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2011, 04:55:43 pm » |
|
The fee helps pay for the parties and expenses of the embassy.
Really, embassies cost a lot of money. What benefits do they provide Canadians abroad?
I remembered my dad told me many years ago when he was being robbed in South Africa, came out penniless after escaped from kidnappers, he went to the Canadian embassy for assistance. The embassy gave him food, shelter and other immediate support. The embassy also helped him to get his new credit card and Canadian passport.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
toby
Champion Member
     
Posts: 1649
Ratings: +85
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Hong Kong
App. Filed.......: November 2009
Med's Done....: October 2009 and 15 April 2011
Interview........: 4 April 2011
Passport Req..: 4 April 2011
VISA ISSUED...: 7 July 2011
LANDED..........: 15 July 2011
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2011, 11:44:10 am » |
|
I remembered my dad told me many years ago when he was being robbed in South Africa, came out penniless after escaped from kidnappers, he went to the Canadian embassy for assistance. The embassy gave him food, shelter and other immediate support. The embassy also helped him to get his new credit card and Canadian passport.
But read Tthordarson's post above. Iceland embassies provide these services at a much lower cost, and are more available as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Nov 09 Application to Mississauga Nov 09 Approved; sent to Hong Kong. Interview April 4, 2011 (so slow!!). Passed. 15 April 2011 New medical done. 7 July 2011 COPR received. 15 July 2011 landed in Vancouver. At last.
|
|
|
threa
Full Member
 
Posts: 35
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Vegreville
App. Filed.......: 12-05-2011
Doc's Request.: 14-07-2011
Med's Done....: 22-02-2011
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2011, 08:33:14 am » |
|
I beeen sponsored by my common-law partner and our application is in process starting May 31 2011. I have an Implied status right now since i applied for an open work permit together with the sponsorship application before my work permit expired. Im Not working anymore coz my employer didnt renew my contract. Now, we plan on visiting the Philippines so we dicided to apply for a visit visa so i can still go back here in Canada but unfortunately it got refused. Im wondering whats my chances of getting an approved visa if i reapply coz we didnt mention on that refused visit visa that we're planning to visit Phils and you think providing the booked plane ticket goibg to the Phils would help if i reapply? Please help coz everything is planned for this trip 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
05.12.11: Application recieved 05.30.11: Started processing 03.18.12: Approved in Principal 03.21.12: Decision Made 05.03.12: Landing in Calgary
|
|
|
|