CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
May 29, 2012, 08:04:15 am
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Canada Immigration Forum > Immigration Topics > Family Class Sponsorship > Topic: question about placing "Not Applicable"
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: question about placing "Not Applicable"  (Read 363 times)
kourts
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 433
Ratings: +4
« on: April 25, 2011, 09:56:07 am »
It says if any sections do not apply to you, write Not Applicable. Do I have to put it in every box that doesn't apply to me? for example my height do I have to put NA in the cm box if i write it in the ft and in box? and for number 10 it asks about a previous spouse if i click no do i have to put NA in the rest of the boxes? and for family members if I'm the only one on the app do i have to put NA in all of the boxes on that page?  I know this is a silly question but I don't want it sent back to me for something so silly. thank you.
Logged
cdngrl
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 260
Ratings: +2
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: New Delhi
App. Filed.......: 10-02-2011
AOR Received.: 16-03-2011
File Transfer...: 16-03-2011 File Received 28-03-2011
Med's Done....: 06-02-2011
Passport Req..: 07-04-2011 Recd on 02-05-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 19-05-2011 Recd on 03-06-2011
LANDED..........: 24-06-2011
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2011, 10:13:39 am »
I put in N/A in any box that was not filled in for me... I think that its a safe bet to do it like this.. atleast there's no confusion since its not blank.

Good Luck!
Logged
fibud
Star Member
****

Posts: 83
Ratings: +3
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: 18-01-2010
AOR Received.: 07-04-2010
Med's Done....: 18-12-09
Interview........: waived
Passport Req..: 03-06-10
VISA ISSUED...: 14-06-10
LANDED..........: 23-06-10
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2011, 11:05:13 am »
Yes.
N/A for each question and space. Some immigration officers will send back an entire application because of one missing N/A.
Logged
OUTLAND: Buffalo
App. rec'd by CPC-M:Jan 19/10
Approval rec'd:Mar 19/10
Forms to MICC: Mar 22/10
AOR Buffalo rec'd: Apr 7/10
CSQ issued: Apr 9/10
PPR: June 3/10
PP sent: June 9/10
Visa rec'd: June 18/10
Landed: June 23/10
kourts
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 433
Ratings: +4
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2011, 09:07:16 pm »
stupid question is it okay to switch between Not Applicable and N/A for the smaller boxes...or should I stick to using one or the other?
Logged
cdngrl
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 260
Ratings: +2
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: New Delhi
App. Filed.......: 10-02-2011
AOR Received.: 16-03-2011
File Transfer...: 16-03-2011 File Received 28-03-2011
Med's Done....: 06-02-2011
Passport Req..: 07-04-2011 Recd on 02-05-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 19-05-2011 Recd on 03-06-2011
LANDED..........: 24-06-2011
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2011, 10:09:09 am »
Why not just keep n/a for all the boxes? But I'm sure it doesn't matter if you alternate as long as its in the box.
Logged
sidkrose
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 323
Ratings: +8
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Berlin
App. Filed.......: 26-07-2011
AOR Received.: 24-10-2011
Med's Done....: 08-07-2011
Interview........: Waived
Passport Req..: 15-11-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 25-11-2011
LANDED..........: 10-12-2011
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2011, 11:14:59 am »
Should we really write N/A in all the little individual boxes, even the date boxes?! Or can we just write it in the first box of a section or question that doesn't apply. You would think they would be able to figure it out...
Logged
Spousal sponsorship, common-law category
mala16
Star Member
****

Posts: 54
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: April 29, 2011
AOR Received.: July 25, 2011
File Transfer...: June 9, 2011 Received in Buffalo
Med's Done....: April 21, 2011
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2011, 01:24:14 pm »
I am so glad you brought this up.  Never thought I had to do this for every space.
Am going back through my application now to fill in Not Applicable or N/A now.
Thank you for bringing this up.

There should a 'tips' or 'helpful hints' posting for small details like this that someone else may not think of.
I mean...who knew they would send back an application for an omission like this???
Logged
FBI Received: January 31, 2011
FBI Issued: February 15, 2011
Application sent FedEx: April 28, 2011
Application delivered: April 29, 2011
Sponsor Approved:  May 30, 2011
Sponsor approval letter received: June 4, 2011
App. received in Buffalo: June 9
kourts
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 433
Ratings: +4
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2011, 02:19:30 pm »
I was only wondering because on the guide it says write Not Applicable,but some boxes are just to small to write it all  out so thats why I was wondering if N/A was okay

 @ mala16
lol.You're welcome. I think of the smallest things. I see people waiting close to a year or over, I want this to go as fast as possible so even if questions are silly I'm still going to ask.

 I apologize in advanced if I annoy anyone with all my questions.  Tongue
Logged
mala16
Star Member
****

Posts: 54
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: April 29, 2011
AOR Received.: July 25, 2011
File Transfer...: June 9, 2011 Received in Buffalo
Med's Done....: April 21, 2011
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2011, 02:26:50 pm »
keep the questions coming!  they have certainly helped me out and i am sure others.
i am working quickly to get my application in this week (tomorrow or thursday!).
any and all advice and tips are appreciated.
and thank goodness for this forum.
best of luck and i will keep my eye out for more of your posts kourts!  Grin
Logged
FBI Received: January 31, 2011
FBI Issued: February 15, 2011
Application sent FedEx: April 28, 2011
Application delivered: April 29, 2011
Sponsor Approved:  May 30, 2011
Sponsor approval letter received: June 4, 2011
App. received in Buffalo: June 9
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
Canada Immigration Forum > Immigration Topics > Family Class Sponsorship > Topic: question about placing "Not Applicable"
 « previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC