CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
May 29, 2012, 03:00:05 am
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Official high security vetting in the UK  (Read 469 times)
Jen85
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 283
Ratings: +5
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: London
App. Filed.......: 03-11-2010
Doc's Request.: 06-05-11 / Sent RCMP Check in 14-06-11
AOR Received.: 09-12-2010
File Transfer...: 30-11-2010
Med's Request: Meds Received
Med's Done....: 25-10-2010
Interview........: Waived
Passport Req..: 11-07-11
LANDED..........: 30-09-11

« on: March 01, 2011, 02:50:42 am »

Not sure if anyone would have any info on this one but thought I would put it out there just in case.  My partner who is the applicant for immigration had to have high security clearance or vetting for his job and he is covered under the Official Secrets Act never to devulge any information he found out while on the job.  Initially we thought this would be an advantage with his immigration application but we were told by an immigration consultant early on in the process that this might actually slow things down.  Does anyone have any knowledge of this type of situation and why it could slow things down?  Any thoughts or ideas?  We didn't actually mention this in his application but I would assume that with the background checks for the immigration, they may very well have found out about it.
Logged

App received In Mississauga 03/11/10
Decision on Sponsorship made 30/11/10
In Process 24/02/11
PitaPata Dog tickers"/img
doctorkb
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 360
Ratings: +10
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo, NY, USA
NOC Code......:
App. Filed.......: 03-JAN-2011
Doc's Request.: 12-SEP-2011 / e-mailed 20-SEP-2011
AOR Received.: 29-APR-2011
File Transfer...: 03-FEB-2011 / In Process 16-AUG-2011
Med's Done....: 29-SEP-2010
Interview........: (waived, get it?)
Passport Req..: 24-OCT-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 11-NOV-2011
LANDED..........: 07-DEC-2011

« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2011, 03:06:16 am »

I could understand that.

It's possible that because it was for the UK, it won't affect anything, with the fact that we share their Head of State. Smiley

However, any other country, I could understand that being an issue as it implies that the individual has knowledge of foreign secrets and could pose a security risk to Canada -- the individual (in theory) could commit treason if called to choose between home country and adopted country...
Logged
Jen85
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 283
Ratings: +5
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: London
App. Filed.......: 03-11-2010
Doc's Request.: 06-05-11 / Sent RCMP Check in 14-06-11
AOR Received.: 09-12-2010
File Transfer...: 30-11-2010
Med's Request: Meds Received
Med's Done....: 25-10-2010
Interview........: Waived
Passport Req..: 11-07-11
LANDED..........: 30-09-11

« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2011, 03:34:46 am »

Hmmm, didn't think about that...but you might be right.  Here I was hoping they would just see that he is an all round good guy and totally trustworthy or he wouldn't have qualified for the security clearance in the first place.  But he did work in an area having to do with atomic weapons (didn't work directly with anything there just in the vicinity of)...maybe Canada thinks he is going to create some weapon of mass destruction when he actually just wants to go fishing and enjoy a quiet and peaceful life!  I guess we better settle in for more waiting then.  Cry
Logged

App received In Mississauga 03/11/10
Decision on Sponsorship made 30/11/10
In Process 24/02/11
PitaPata Dog tickers"/img
Baloo
VIP Member
*******

Posts: 4946
Ratings: +192

« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2011, 07:33:18 am »

Not sure if anyone would have any info on this one but thought I would put it out there just in case.  My partner who is the applicant for immigration had to have high security clearance or vetting for his job and he is covered under the Official Secrets Act never to devulge any information he found out while on the job.  Initially we thought this would be an advantage with his immigration application but we were told by an immigration consultant early on in the process that this might actually slow things down.  Does anyone have any knowledge of this type of situation and why it could slow things down?  Any thoughts or ideas?  We didn't actually mention this in his application but I would assume that with the background checks for the immigration, they may very well have found out about it.

Many people have to sign the OSA as part of their job, it is more common than you might think.
General clearance wont help or hinder IMO, all the standard checks will still be performed - but that may not be the case with higher clearance categories.
Logged

Hoping for an immigration stream for everyone with this tattoo on their thigh
I provide opinions drawn from experience - I am not a lawyer. Questions? - Check Immipedia http://immipedia.ca
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC