CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
November 23, 2009, 10:36:12 pm
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: is there a big difference between spousal and common law:  (Read 259 times)
raycrawford
Full Member
***
Posts: 40


« on: February 21, 2009, 09:45:16 pm »

Just wondering if the common law applications are as successful as the spousal, assuming all evidence is equal?  I read so many times where common law is so tricky?

If you have been together for over a year and have all the required documents, why is it so tricky?

Is there anything I am missing here?

Regards,

Ray
Logged
RobsLuv
Hero Member
*****
Gender: Female
Posts: 656


« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2009, 09:58:47 pm »

It's just that a common-law application requires not only that you prove yours is a genuine relationship, but that you also prove that you meet the eligibility requirements to be considered common-law partners. 

Section 5.34 of the OP2 processing manual describes it this way: "A common-law relationship is fact-based and exists from the day in which two individuals demonstrate that the relationship exists on the basis of the facts. The onus is on the applicants to prove that they are in a conjugal relationship and that they are cohabiting, having so cohabited for a period of at least one year, when the application is received at CPC-M.  A common-law relationship is legally a de facto relationship, meaning that it must be established in each individual case, on the facts. This is in contrast to a marriage, which is legally a de jure relationship, meaning that it has been established in law."
Logged

Married Sept '06 after 4 yr LDR.  Applied via outland ap in March 2007 -  refused Jan '08 due to inadmissible adult "dependent child".  Appeal filed Jan '08; still waiting for resolution.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.1 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC