CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
November 21, 2009, 07:29:55 pm
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: I have got rejection by Visa officer made mistake on my marks. Need help Please.  (Read 1350 times)
198309271
Member
**
Posts: 11


« on: October 23, 2009, 01:26:43 pm »

The table below sets out the point assessed for each of selection criteria:

FACTORS                                            POINTS ASSESSED       MAXIMUM POSSIBLE
AGE                                                            10                                     10     

EDUCATION                                                 20                                     25

OFFICIAL LANGUAGE                                     8                                       24
PROFICIENCY

EXPERIENCE                                                 21                                    21

ARRANGED EMPLOYMENT                               0                                      10

ADAPTABILITY                                            10                                       10

TOTAL                                                       65                                     100

And If I add up the points together total is 69. It passed 67.
But the letter I got from CIC said "You have obtained insufficient points to qualify for immigration to Canada, the minimum requirement being 67 points. As a result, I am not satisfied that you will be able to become economically established in Canada."

This officer might give me the wrong points from EXPERIENCE I only have two years working experience. But I have 3 years PGWP and I also have a permanent job offer. I am supposed to award 10 points from arranged employment.
 
After I got this letter I have fax CIC, told them where them made mistakes. But so far I didn't get any replay from them. What should I do. Thanks.

Logged
BobbyB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1346


« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2009, 01:39:45 pm »

Notify them immediately, elaborating and explaining your concerns. You need to be sure though, that this is the reason for rejecting your case. Don't forget that the IO responsible for your case can exercise his power of "Negative Substitution" i.e even if you meet all the requirements and the IO still thinks you will not be able to successfully establish yourself  in CA, he may reject your case.

Are these the exact contents of their letter to you?

If, it is London office, go to their web-site, where you can email them directly.


BobbyB
« Last Edit: October 23, 2009, 01:51:04 pm by BobbyB » Logged

"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change".-Darwin. To become successful you must be a person of action.Merely to "know" is not sufficient.It is necessary to both know and do.
198309271
Member
**
Posts: 11


« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2009, 01:48:39 pm »

I have got this letter from Hong Kong last month. I have fax them at the same day which I got this letter.  Two weeks after I email them again. I have waited for 5 weeks from I fax them my concern. I didn't get any reply so far.
Logged
BobbyB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1346


« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2009, 01:51:35 pm »

I have got this letter from Hong Kong last month. I have fax them at the same day which I got this letter.  Two weeks after I email them again. I have waited for 5 weeks from I fax them my concern. I didn't get any reply so far.



Are these the exact contents of their letter to you?
Logged

"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change".-Darwin. To become successful you must be a person of action.Merely to "know" is not sufficient.It is necessary to both know and do.
saedmahraan
Full Member
***
Posts: 46


« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2009, 01:56:05 pm »

sorry   dear   

but   how  you  got    10  points  in adaptability   ?

I think   IO   did not  take  care  about  this  point  mainly
Logged
198309271
Member
**
Posts: 11


« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2009, 01:59:08 pm »

Subsection 11(1) of the Act states that a foreign national must, before entering Canada, apply to an officer for a visa or for any other document required by the regulations. The visa or document shall be issued if, following an examination, the officer is satisfied that the foreign national is not inadmissible and meets the requirements of this Act.

Following an examination of your application, I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of the Act and the Regulations for the reasons explained above. I am therefore refusing your application.

There are all the comments in the letter
Logged
198309271
Member
**
Posts: 11


« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2009, 02:00:21 pm »

I have got my degree in canada and I have worked two years in canada after I graduated. so I have 10 points.
Logged
hao8165
Member
**
Posts: 12


« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2009, 02:18:29 pm »

Is your employment offer veryfied by HRSDC?  An AEO must be verified by HRSDC before sending the application to CIC.
Logged
job_seeker
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 437


« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2009, 02:25:41 pm »

Is your employment offer veryfied by HRSDC?  An AEO must be verified by HRSDC before sending the application to CIC.

He has 0 points for AEO. Maybe the officer erred in his addition because you certainly have 69 points! as per his assessment.
Logged
BobbyB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1346


« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2009, 02:37:49 pm »

Looks to be a case of miscalculation.
Logged

"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change".-Darwin. To become successful you must be a person of action.Merely to "know" is not sufficient.It is necessary to both know and do.
tran
Star Member
****
Posts: 82


« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2009, 02:38:12 pm »

You indeed have 69 points. If including arranged employment, you
have 69+10=79 points.

Maybe it's just an honest mistake by the IO. Your case is worth
pursuing further.
Logged
kali
Member
**
Posts: 12


« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2009, 02:41:00 pm »

It's clear Visa officer made mistake, bad luck !!!
If you couldn't reach them...why don't you try from Canadain Experence Class, if you qualify...I guess it is processed fast.
Logged
198309271
Member
**
Posts: 11


« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2009, 02:43:51 pm »

I think I belong to this so I should get 10 points from AEO

(2) the applicant is currently working in
Canada pursuant to R82(2)(b):
• in a confirmation-exempt category
under the North America Free
Trade Agreement, the General
Agreement on Trade and Services,
or the Canada-Chile Free Trade
Agreement;
• in a significant-benefit category,
such as an intra- company
transferee
• in the category where limited
access to the labour market is
granted for public policy reasons
(i.e., post-graduate work,
spouse/common-law partner of
temporary skilled worker/foreign
student, etc.).
• the work permit is valid at the time
of the permanent resident visa
application and at the time the visa
is issued; and
• the employer has made an offer to
employ the applicant on an
indeterminate basis if the
permanent resident visa is issued.
Logged
198309271
Member
**
Posts: 11


« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2009, 02:46:21 pm »

I don't know how to reach the CIC officer. I have fax them and email them. I don't konw whatelse I can do.

I have NOC at level A. I did't get enought IELTS s to apply CEC.
Logged
198309271
Member
**
Posts: 11


« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2009, 03:10:26 pm »

CIC makes me so frustrated. If I am going to appeal on federal court, I have to go through a lawyer. It will take me a year and I have to pay lot money for a lawyer. CIC wastes my time and money. Is there anyway I can complain with? 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.1 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC