That will definitely not happen unfortunately. Or is a very long long shot.
Don't I get any benefits from having my family already live there? from having such circumstances?
So you are saying you do not wish to move to Canada at this point? Do you really want this PR? The question is how badly do you want it?
You have a couple of more options:
1) If you wait until your PR card expires, then apply for a travel document which will be denied and therefore lose your PR, your parents could sponsor you again if you are still a full time student at that time, financially dependent on your parents and not married and not living in a common law relationship.
2) Try to renew your PR card claiming you were staying outside Canada taking care of your sick grandfather. This is a bit sketchy as you would have to prove that he was sick and also you would have to explain if your main reason being outside Canada was taking care of him, why did you not move back as he died.
Leon: What are the chances a border officer will figure out that he cannot meet the PR requirements, and deny him entry to Canada, or at least require him to prove he meets the requirements by the fifth anniversary of landing? if he is given this (I forget the technical term), subsequent days in Canada don't qualify for his 730-day quota.
Being reported on entry seems to be rather uncommon. Being given a stern talking to is more common. First they only know his entry dates when his passport is stamped and they don't know his leaving dates if his passport is not stamped. He has been coming to Canada every year so they will likely have no idea how long he was gone. Second, even if they know, they can not deny him entry, at the most report him and he would be able to appeal. However, being reported doesn't seem to be that common. If he says he had to stay to take care of his sick grandfather who just died, they will very likely say ok, just show proof of that when you apply to renew your PR card. However, if he waits to renew until he meets the residency requirements again he would not even have to show that proof.