CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
May 23, 2013, 07:24:38 am
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: DMP mixed up "principal applicant" and "sponsor" on medical forms  (Read 588 times)
muchacha
Star Member
****

Posts: 108
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Guatemala.. now Mexico?
App. Filed.......: 09-08-2012
AOR Received.: 16-12-2012
File Transfer...: 19-09-2012

« on: June 01, 2012, 06:34:26 pm »

Hi all - this is my first post here - I am just beginning the process of applying for a PR visa for my husband. Looking for some advice...

Today my husband went to get his medicals done (I am currently in Canada and he is in his own country) and the DMP filled out my name and information in the "principal applicant" area of the IMM 1017, even though I am the sponsor, and my husband is the principal applicant. We just called the doctor after noticing and the doctor insists that this is the correct way to fill out the forms.

The box that says "the principal applicant is the same as above" is also checked off - however, then the doctor proceeded to put my info under the section that follows.

Wondering if this is a big deal? He also put in my information in Appendix C under "principal applicant"...

Very worried right now... hopefully someone can advise?

Thanks in advance.
Logged
mrandmrsromero
Guest
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2012, 01:43:46 pm »

The doctor did the same thing on my husband's original medical forms as well (put my info down as principal applicant).  I remember questioning the terminology as well given that I am the sponsor; but it was fine.
Logged
muchacha
Star Member
****

Posts: 108
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Guatemala.. now Mexico?
App. Filed.......: 09-08-2012
AOR Received.: 16-12-2012
File Transfer...: 19-09-2012

« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2012, 04:33:04 pm »

Thanks for the response! That is reassuring - apparently others have had the same experience. So... we're going with it!
Logged
canadianwoman
VIP Member
*******

Posts: 3632
Ratings: +115
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Accra, Ghana
App. Filed.......: 30-01-2008
Interview........: 05-05-2009

« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2012, 11:03:47 am »

The doctor made a mistake. There are many types of immigrants, and the one this doctor is most familiar with is the one where both spouses are immigrating, one as the principal applicant and one as his/her dependent. The doctor has mixed up this common type with your type.
However, some forum members have reported that CIC was able to figure it out and everything was OK.

Personally, I'd send in a complaint to CIC about this.
Logged
muchacha
Star Member
****

Posts: 108
Ratings: +0
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Guatemala.. now Mexico?
App. Filed.......: 09-08-2012
AOR Received.: 16-12-2012
File Transfer...: 19-09-2012

« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2012, 04:00:46 pm »

Hm that's what I figured - I know it is wrong but I am hoping that whoever is processing it will figure it out. We haven't sent in our app yet - would you include this 'complaint' along with the application?
Logged
canadianwoman
VIP Member
*******

Posts: 3632
Ratings: +115
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Accra, Ghana
App. Filed.......: 30-01-2008
Interview........: 05-05-2009

« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2012, 10:44:32 am »

I would mention it in the application.
However, I think you should also send a complaint to CIC separately.
Logged
itscoezy
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 522
Ratings: +7
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Mexico City
Job Offer........: Yes
App. Filed.......: 09-05-2012
Doc's Request.: 10-10-2012
AOR Received.: 10-10-2012
File Transfer...: 07-08-2012
Med's Done....: 10-04-2012
Interview........: 20-11-2012
Passport Req..: 03-01-2013

« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2012, 11:19:44 am »

For ours they put my SO as the principal applicant which was correct but put 1 of his daughters as their canadian Activity permanent resident as well which was not the case.  I told him it was incorrect and he insisted it was the correct way to fill out the form.

Then, for the other 2 daughters that were examined after he put 'dependent child' goodness - doctors just can't admit they are wrong lol.

I'm sure everythnig will be okay! Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC