CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
May 27, 2012, 06:31:48 pm
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Custody question (USA)  (Read 242 times)
awor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 607
Ratings: +5
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo -> LA
App. Filed.......: 26 Aug 2011
AOR Received.: 15 Dec 2011
File Transfer...: CPC-M to Buffalo: 03 Nov 2011 Buffalo to LA: 19 Jan 2012
Med's Done....: 11 Apr 2011 Ecas shows received 5 Mar 2012
Passport Req..: 7 Mar 2012 Decision Made: 1 Apr 2012
VISA ISSUED...: 29 Mar 2012 CORP Received: 19 Apr 2012
LANDED..........: Sumas: 25 April 2012

« on: May 25, 2011, 05:49:48 pm »

I know no one is a lawyer (or at least the lawyers aren't going to give free legal advice!!), I just need opinions.

If you missed my other thread, I had tried contacting my ex to get permission to immigrate with my 2 older kids. He refuses to respond, and none of his family will respond either. No surprise. We haven't heard from him in 13 years. No, I cannot have his parental rights taken away, the state won't allow it unless my husband were to adopt them (this is faster).

So I am in the middle of doing the paperwork to do a custody modification. I have full legal and physical custody, but he has visitation so I need to remove that. I'm 99% certain he won't file a response and it will default to me, giving me what I need to take the kids over the border.

What I'm here to ask about is the wording I'm using. I would like some "expert OPINION" on my wording, if you think it will be sufficient in the eyes of CIC. This is the wording Idaho (the state I had to modify custody in) requires - mother, father, etc.

Quote
Legal Custody.
Mother will retain sole legal custody including being allowed to move across state and international borders, and obtain legal permanent residency in any foreign countries for the children, without needing to notify or ask the permission of the father.

Physical Custody.
Mother will retain sole physical custody, including being allowed to move across state and international borders, without needing to notify or ask the permission of the father.

Visitation/Parenting Plan.
Change as follows: The father shall have no custody, and no parenting time or visiting, of/with the minor children, by any means: phone, email, internet, in person, or any other method, until they are of the age that this order is no longer valid.

I will not (can't) hire a lawyer for this, they want $6000 for the same thing I can do for the price of printing and the filing fee and having my ex served.

Logged

194d (6m, 10d) from App Filed to PPR
Buffalo
Transfers from Buffalo
August 2011
steaky
Champion Member
******

Posts: 2858
Ratings: +63

« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2011, 06:23:56 pm »

If you think you can do it without lawyers, then try to do it yourself.
Logged
awor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 607
Ratings: +5
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo -> LA
App. Filed.......: 26 Aug 2011
AOR Received.: 15 Dec 2011
File Transfer...: CPC-M to Buffalo: 03 Nov 2011 Buffalo to LA: 19 Jan 2012
Med's Done....: 11 Apr 2011 Ecas shows received 5 Mar 2012
Passport Req..: 7 Mar 2012 Decision Made: 1 Apr 2012
VISA ISSUED...: 29 Mar 2012 CORP Received: 19 Apr 2012
LANDED..........: Sumas: 25 April 2012

« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2011, 07:39:43 pm »

I'm definitely going to do it myself, but I do want to attempt to make sure the wording will appease CIC. Even the family lawyers I spoke to didn't have a clue, and immigration lawyers were that much more clueless.
Logged

194d (6m, 10d) from App Filed to PPR
Buffalo
Transfers from Buffalo
August 2011
canadianwoman
Champion Member
******

Posts: 2841
Ratings: +88
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Accra, Ghana
App. Filed.......: 30-01-2008
Interview........: 05-05-2009

« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2011, 10:12:26 pm »

Why add "by phone, internet, or email"? You want him to have no visitation rights, which is reasonable, since he doesn't seem to want to visit them, but I would be afraid the courts might see refusing contact by phone or email as being too harsh.
Logged
awor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 607
Ratings: +5
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo -> LA
App. Filed.......: 26 Aug 2011
AOR Received.: 15 Dec 2011
File Transfer...: CPC-M to Buffalo: 03 Nov 2011 Buffalo to LA: 19 Jan 2012
Med's Done....: 11 Apr 2011 Ecas shows received 5 Mar 2012
Passport Req..: 7 Mar 2012 Decision Made: 1 Apr 2012
VISA ISSUED...: 29 Mar 2012 CORP Received: 19 Apr 2012
LANDED..........: Sumas: 25 April 2012

« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2011, 12:00:13 am »

Hmmm. I think you might be right. It's unnecessary as well, for immigration purposes.

So I'll just leave that part off. I think the rest is about as iron-clad and clear as I can make a legal document.

Thanks for the input Smiley
Logged

194d (6m, 10d) from App Filed to PPR
Buffalo
Transfers from Buffalo
August 2011
Tiggilicious
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 207
Ratings: +4
Category........: FAM
Visa Office......: Buffalo
App. Filed.......: 01-02-2011
AOR Received.: 28-06-2011
File Transfer...: 01-03-2011
Med's Request: 31-07-2011
Med's Done....: 14-01-2011
Interview........: waived
Passport Req..: 08-08-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 30-08-2011

« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2011, 08:30:31 am »

You would want to show the court that you are flexible ; that if he ever wanted to contact his kids - that he can, as they haven't terminated his rights as a father. But you just want am order that you can move with the kids
Logged

USA -> Canada, Outland, Common-Law  (Florida to Nova Scotia!!!)
Feb 01 2011  App Rcv'd at CIC-M
July 14 2011  In-process (ecas)
Aug 09 2011  Passport Request!
Aug 30 2011  Visa issued
Oct 6  2001   LANDED!!!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC