|
shibuya
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: May 22, 2011, 02:03:48 pm » |
|
This is a absolute baseless allegation on CIC. If the rejection letter is posted here on the forum we could conclude on this row. But again the rejection letter could be modified by Nema & co.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nema
Member
Posts: 10
Ratings: +0
|
|
« Reply #61 on: May 22, 2011, 05:18:02 pm » |
|
Guys
we are all at risk for being pre June applicant having lost position in NOC.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Purkoni
Hero Member
Posts: 271
Ratings: +7
Category........: FSW3
Visa Office......: Buffalo
Pre-Assessed..: Yes
App. Filed.......: 08-02-2010
Doc's Request.: 06-04-2010
AOR Received.: 17-09-2010
File Transfer...: 02-11-2011 to Seattle,WA
Med's Request: 14-02-2012
Med's Done....: 27-02-2012
Interview........: no
Passport Req..: waiting
VISA ISSUED...: waiting
LANDED..........: waiting
|
|
« Reply #62 on: May 22, 2011, 05:25:18 pm » |
|
Dear Nema,please dont *censored word* us with your comment's. Relax people everything will be ok. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObMI5NoWfoA&feature=related |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Your application was reviewed and we started processing on January 10, 2012
|
|
|
nema
Member
Posts: 10
Ratings: +0
|
|
« Reply #63 on: May 22, 2011, 05:51:03 pm » |
|
I have no comment for those who don't believe me. what i am writing i based on the evidence i have seen visibly.
I cant write the whole statements of visa consular here; but mention single line which is enough to understand......
"I am not convinced with your work experience and supporting documents in the light of ministerial instruction announced June 26, 2010."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Purkoni
Hero Member
Posts: 271
Ratings: +7
Category........: FSW3
Visa Office......: Buffalo
Pre-Assessed..: Yes
App. Filed.......: 08-02-2010
Doc's Request.: 06-04-2010
AOR Received.: 17-09-2010
File Transfer...: 02-11-2011 to Seattle,WA
Med's Request: 14-02-2012
Med's Done....: 27-02-2012
Interview........: no
Passport Req..: waiting
VISA ISSUED...: waiting
LANDED..........: waiting
|
|
« Reply #64 on: May 22, 2011, 05:56:17 pm » |
|
If you can not write that statement you can scan and shaw to all of us! It will be fer from your side.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Your application was reviewed and we started processing on January 10, 2012
|
|
|
Mogboy
Star Member
Posts: 152
Ratings: +20
|
|
« Reply #65 on: May 22, 2011, 06:45:36 pm » |
|
Government workers do not write in the first person, this cannot be real.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mogboy
Star Member
Posts: 152
Ratings: +20
|
|
« Reply #66 on: May 22, 2011, 06:47:44 pm » |
|
The sentence quoted by Nema is in appalling English and I doubt that anyone with that level of education would be employed at the Delhi office.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mogboy
Star Member
Posts: 152
Ratings: +20
|
|
« Reply #67 on: May 22, 2011, 06:51:28 pm » |
|
Hi,
I live in Toronto. If anyone is hoping to move here and I can be of any assistance I will do my best to answer your questions. I wish you all the very best of luck. You will find Canada a welcoming place.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
canadaforall
Champion Member
Posts: 1487
Ratings: +58
Category........: FSW1
App. Filed.......: 30th January 2009
Doc's Request.: February .12 .2009
AOR Received.: 30. 08.2009
IELTS Request: no
File Transfer...: 16.2.2009
Med's Request: march 27th 2012
Med's Done....: 5 april 2012
Interview........: waved
Passport Req..: March 27th 2912
VISA ISSUED...: 12.06.2012
LANDED..........: 15.09.2012.
|
|
« Reply #68 on: May 22, 2011, 10:34:17 pm » |
|
The sentence quoted by Nema is in appalling English and I doubt that anyone with that level of education would be employed at the Delhi office.
I agree with you. Let him scan and paste the copy, for us to have a look. Waiting then. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
January 30th 2009 : Application Filed
february 12th 2009 :
June 30th 2009 : Documents sent to Visa Office
february 23rd 2012 : In process with received by Visa Office in the inside details. address also disappeare
27th March medicals, pcc,
|
|
|
haral
Champion Member
Posts: 1887
Ratings: +68
Category........: FSW1
|
|
« Reply #69 on: May 22, 2011, 11:17:03 pm » |
|
thats a pretty normal statement in rejection letter to someone who has'nt been able to provide proof they fall in the NOC they applied in...... seems to me your case is rejected...i am sorry for you.....
I have no comment for those who don't believe me. what i am writing i based on the evidence i have seen visibly.
I cant write the whole statements of visa consular here; but mention single line which is enough to understand......
"I am not convinced with your work experience and supporting documents in the light of ministerial instruction announced June 26, 2010."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vermas
|
|
« Reply #70 on: May 22, 2011, 11:23:15 pm » |
|
I think this rejection was because of the poor quality of documents submitted. If the applicant met Ministrial Instructions-1 at the time of applying, the application would be assessed and processed accordingly.
I have no comment for those who don't believe me. what i am writing i based on the evidence i have seen visibly.
I cant write the whole statements of visa consular here; but mention single line which is enough to understand......
"I am not convinced with your work experience and supporting documents in the light of ministerial instruction announced June 26, 2010."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
haral
Champion Member
Posts: 1887
Ratings: +68
Category........: FSW1
|
|
« Reply #71 on: May 22, 2011, 11:32:55 pm » |
|
I guess the best thing in such threads where rumours are ebing spread should be to completely ignore them.....Let the ignorant feed on rotten fish.......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
coolguy2010
Champion Member
Posts: 2889
Ratings: +95
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London to Paris
NOC Code......: 1111
Pre-Assessed..: Yes
App. Filed.......: 04-05-2010
Doc's Request.: 23-10-2010
Nomination.....: 09-06-2011
AOR Received.: 09-06-2011
IELTS Request: 6 Band
File Transfer...: 01-03-2013
Med's Request: 01-03-2013
Med's Done....: 30-03-2013
Interview........: NA
Passport Req..: 20-05-2013
VISA ISSUED...: 29-05-2013
LANDED..........: Aug 2013
|
|
« Reply #72 on: May 22, 2011, 11:33:00 pm » |
|
This is a absolute baseless allegation on CIC. If the rejection letter is posted here on the forum we could conclude on this row. But again the rejection letter could be modified by Nema & co. agree with shibu..... there are some negative people on this forum (like nema) who just know to spread rumours. Regards Cool |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the number of moments that take our breath away
|
|
|
nema
Member
Posts: 10
Ratings: +0
|
|
« Reply #73 on: May 22, 2011, 11:36:30 pm » |
|
Hi guys
see this rejection letter:
“You have indicated that you have work experience in an occupation with the following NOC (National Occupational Classification) code: 1111 - ACCOUNTANT. Although this NOC code corresponds to the occupations specified in the Instructions identified by the Minister, you have not provided sufficient evidence that you performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of the occupation as set out in the occupational description of the NOC- 1111; ACCOUNTANT, including all of the essential duties.
After taking into consideration the work experience supporting documentation on file, I am not satisfied that you have performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of an ACCOUNTANT. As such, I am not satisfied that you are really a ACCOUNTANT - 1111
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vermas
|
|
« Reply #74 on: May 22, 2011, 11:49:08 pm » |
|
It clearly indicates that rejection is due to poor/insufficient documents submitted. Please do not generalise rejection of certain NOCs. Hi guys
see this rejection letter:
“You have indicated that you have work experience in an occupation with the following NOC (National Occupational Classification) code: 1111 - ACCOUNTANT. Although this NOC code corresponds to the occupations specified in the Instructions identified by the Minister, you have not provided sufficient evidence that you performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of the occupation as set out in the occupational description of the NOC- 1111; ACCOUNTANT, including all of the essential duties.
After taking into consideration the work experience supporting documentation on file, I am not satisfied that you have performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation or that you performed a substantial number of the main duties of an ACCOUNTANT. As such, I am not satisfied that you are really a ACCOUNTANT - 1111
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Immigration Forum
