I never mentioned anything about BC Tel and I'm aware they were not owned by the BC government.
I was covering all bases -- the widespread perception is that BC Tel was a crown corporation -- and as BC Tel is half of Telus, it only made sense.
My sister in Toronto has been digging around now for some time to learn who owns Bell and so far has come up with nothing.
It's publicly traded. If you buy a share, you can go to the annual shareholder's meeting and participate in the proceedings -- it should be easy to see who the big players are. Like Telus, Bell cannot be more than 1/3rd foreign owned (as far as voting shares go). *IF* an EU or US company could buy either of these firms, the consumer would be MUCH better off.
I get offers all the time from other companies but they never beat what Telus is offering, at least what I'm seeing.
Funny, I've had Vonage for a while -- way better (both price & service) wise than Telus. I've had Fido for mobile -- again, better for price and service than Telus.
The only thing Telus is good for (in my world) is ADSL. In that case, they offer better price and better service than Shaw (the only real alternative for high-speed Internet where I am).
And what is wrong with pointing fingers at the government? Upcoming selections or not...
We're going to see enough mud-slinging over the next month and a half... it would be nice if private citizens could stick to the truth.

Besides, which government sold out? I think the federal Liberals have done much more selling out than any other government...
