CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
May 19, 2013, 08:10:03 am
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: 1 ... 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 ... 347   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Background Checks -EXPLAINED >>>  (Read 493767 times)
toronto2
Star Member
****

Posts: 80
Ratings: +1

« Reply #2970 on: March 18, 2012, 03:26:59 pm »

to yezdi


have u done the medical yet
which consulate u belong

ask ur employer if he can help you other do you have any tax returns or documents showing ur proof that u  worked for that employer
and write a explained letter to ur vo if u cant get anything fom ur employer
Logged
sohail-khan86
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 228
Ratings: +4
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: CHC London
App. Filed.......: 10-10-2009
Doc's Request.: 4-6-2010
IELTS Request: sent with application
Med's Request: 13-12-2010
Med's Done....: 27-12-2010---------- re-meds (24-2-2012)
Interview........: sept 2011... Case Approved...
Passport Req..: 25/7/2012.. decision made. (28/8/2012) lets see when I get my passport back now..
VISA ISSUED...: 22/8/2012
LANDED..........: 27th jan 13 n became permanent resident...

« Reply #2971 on: March 18, 2012, 05:31:20 pm »

Hi Qorax

I have received communication from the Canadian Consulate after nearly 3 years of my application regarding the results of the background verification. They have mentioned that the phone numbers in the reference letter are not valid and the website is not functional. They are in doubt about my employment with the company.  They have given me 30 days to reply, failing which they would take a decision based on the information on my file.

I had worked in this company about 10 years back. I got in touch with my co-workers from then and, they informed me that the company closed shop in 2007 or 2008.  Naturally, the background verification has failed due to no fault of mine.  Unfortunately, I did not retain any documents from my employment other than the experience letter, as I moved to the States for Graduate studies and my folks cleaned out my room after I left. Who would have thought 10 years down the line, I might need them!

I am going to explain to the consulate the situation. But, I am sure that my explanation might not be enough to convince them.  Any suggestions or thoughts on my situation would be greatly appreciated. I have about 15 days left to answer their queries.

Thanks

You are right that they won't be convinced.. Even I am not convinced, then how are they suppose to..I am sure if you have worked there you must have some other kind of proof.. Try searching for it..
Logged
2011july20
Star Member
****

Posts: 56
Ratings: +1

« Reply #2972 on: March 18, 2012, 10:41:30 pm »

You are right that they won't be convinced.. Even I am not convinced, then how are they suppose to..I am sure if you have worked there you must have some other kind of proof.. Try searching for it..

You should have something else as a proof-for example a copy of the pay stub which should bear the name of the payer (company you worked for). Even with direct deposit, the bank statement shoud show the origin of the funds. Good luck.
Logged
sohail-khan86
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 228
Ratings: +4
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: CHC London
App. Filed.......: 10-10-2009
Doc's Request.: 4-6-2010
IELTS Request: sent with application
Med's Request: 13-12-2010
Med's Done....: 27-12-2010---------- re-meds (24-2-2012)
Interview........: sept 2011... Case Approved...
Passport Req..: 25/7/2012.. decision made. (28/8/2012) lets see when I get my passport back now..
VISA ISSUED...: 22/8/2012
LANDED..........: 27th jan 13 n became permanent resident...

« Reply #2973 on: March 19, 2012, 01:02:28 am »

You should have something else as a proof-for example a copy of the pay stub which should bear the name of the payer (company you worked for). Even with direct deposit, the bank statement shoud show the origin of the funds. Good luck.

Very true.. These are some nice ideas. There must be bank record or something.. However if you are unable to give any proof besides that letter you are going to write. You and I both know whats going to happen.. Best of luck..
Logged
deba_avik
Champion Member
******

Posts: 2170
Ratings: +125
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: Singapore
NOC Code......: 1111
App. Filed.......: 26-02-2010
Doc's Request.: 07-04-2010
AOR Received.: 29-07-2010 (2nd AOR)
File Transfer...: 14-04-2010
Med's Request: In Process since March 05, 2012
Med's Done....: Waiting

« Reply #2974 on: March 19, 2012, 01:55:31 am »

Hello Qorax Sir

Thanks indeed for replying Sir. Its very nice of you.

So if we visit any organisation for newcomers, is it ok to tell them that we are more than willing to take any survival job at first? Can they also guide in making our resume for survival job?

You can prefer, apply and do whatever job you like while you are in Canada. No problem.
Logged

Application Filed: February 26, 2010
Doc sent.: July 15 ,2010
2nd AOR received from SGVO: July 29, 2010
Current Status: In Process from March 05, 2012

Arise, awake and stop not till the goal is reached
deba_avik
Champion Member
******

Posts: 2170
Ratings: +125
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: Singapore
NOC Code......: 1111
App. Filed.......: 26-02-2010
Doc's Request.: 07-04-2010
AOR Received.: 29-07-2010 (2nd AOR)
File Transfer...: 14-04-2010
Med's Request: In Process since March 05, 2012
Med's Done....: Waiting

« Reply #2975 on: March 19, 2012, 02:06:38 am »

Hi Qorax

I have received communication from the Canadian Consulate after nearly 3 years of my application regarding the results of the background verification. They have mentioned that the phone numbers in the reference letter are not valid and the website is not functional. They are in doubt about my employment with the company.  They have given me 30 days to reply, failing which they would take a decision based on the information on my file.

I had worked in this company about 10 years back. I got in touch with my co-workers from then and, they informed me that the company closed shop in 2007 or 2008.  Naturally, the background verification has failed due to no fault of mine.  Unfortunately, I did not retain any documents from my employment other than the experience letter, as I moved to the States for Graduate studies and my folks cleaned out my room after I left. Who would have thought 10 years down the line, I might need them!

I am going to explain to the consulate the situation. But, I am sure that my explanation might not be enough to convince them.  Any suggestions or thoughts on my situation would be greatly appreciated. I have about 15 days left to answer their queries.

Thanks

What about the company after they closed? Were they totally demolished or amalgamated or absorbed by another company? If it is transformed , the existing company can help you regarding the matter.

On the other hand, as previously recommended by others, are very nice ideas. Best of luck!!
Logged

Application Filed: February 26, 2010
Doc sent.: July 15 ,2010
2nd AOR received from SGVO: July 29, 2010
Current Status: In Process from March 05, 2012

Arise, awake and stop not till the goal is reached
Yezdi2112
Full Member
***

Posts: 29
Ratings: +1

« Reply #2976 on: March 19, 2012, 06:12:53 am »

to yezdi

have u done the medical yet
which consulate u belong

ask ur employer if he can help you other do you have any tax returns or documents showing ur proof that u  worked for that employer
and write a explained letter to ur vo if u cant get anything fom ur employer

No Medicals have been asked and so not yet reached that stage.
New Delhi is the consulate.

I used to not file my returns during that period. I was getting paid peanuts of 4k per month with no other benifits.

Thanks for your response.
Logged
Yezdi2112
Full Member
***

Posts: 29
Ratings: +1

« Reply #2977 on: March 19, 2012, 06:19:52 am »

You are right that they won't be convinced.. Even I am not convinced, then how are they suppose to..I am sure if you have worked there you must have some other kind of proof.. Try searching for it..

You are right. Even I would not be convinced if I was in their shoes. Unfortunately, there are no records. I have even gone to the attic to see if something relevant was retained. What I found were records and documents dated more than 100 years ago. But, none related to me !
Logged
Yezdi2112
Full Member
***

Posts: 29
Ratings: +1

« Reply #2978 on: March 19, 2012, 06:41:30 am »

What about the company after they closed? Were they totally demolished or amalgamated or absorbed by another company? If it is transformed , the existing company can help you regarding the matter.

On the other hand, as previously recommended by others, are very nice ideas. Best of luck!!

Actually, what information I have gathered is from my co-workers at that time. Second hand information is even more dangerous. That is the reason, I am in a dilemma.

A lot of things have changed in the last 10 years. Many companies went bust in the aftermath of the dotcom burst and many others were affected during this recession. Even my profile has changed over time and for that matter a lot after applying for the PR. i am not even working since a month. Right now, I am preparing to tie up affairs here and land in Denmark to activate my PR. They did not have any issues with the BG checks.

The Canadian consulate is doing a check after 3 years after my application and expect the details to match. Probably, if they had done their checks earlier, there might have not been confusion.

All I can think of now, is to write a explaination and see how that works out. I do not want to be sitting around waiting for the consulate to turn around. I had put a lot of things on hold hoping the PR would come soon.

Anyways, thanks for your response.
Logged
MBKP
Star Member
****

Posts: 145
Ratings: +7
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: LONDON
NOC Code......: 0213
App. Filed.......: 01-05-2009
Doc's Request.: 03-08-2009
AOR Received.: 28-08-2009
File Transfer...: 30-06-2010
Med's Request: 06-08-2011
Med's Done....: 09-08-2011
Interview........: Re-Medical  08-12-2012
Passport Req..: PPR-1:  16-01-2013 PPR-2:  01-02-2013
VISA ISSUED...: 11-02-2012
LANDED..........: Soon INSHA ALLAH

« Reply #2979 on: March 19, 2012, 11:31:13 pm »

Dear Qorax!
As advised by you, I sent a case specific inquiry to London V.O.  Following is the response:
 
Dear Applicant,
 
This refers to your recent message.
Please be advised that your application is awaiting the review of an Immigration Officer.
 
 
Yours Sincerely,
 
NXR



What is your view on this Smiley
Logged
qorax
VIP Member
*******

Posts: 11789
Ratings: +2117

« Reply #2980 on: March 20, 2012, 06:51:42 am »

Dear Qorax!
As advised by you, I sent a case specific inquiry to London V.O.  Following is the response:
 
Dear Applicant,
 
This refers to your recent message.
Please be advised that your application is awaiting the review of an Immigration Officer.
 
Yours Sincerely,
 
NXR



What is your view on this Smiley

Either the security checks aren't complete, or it's still in queue.
Logged

"Do your little bit of good where you are - its those little bits of good put together - that overwhelm the world." -Desmond Tutu

Qorax INDEXED:
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/-t74858.0.html
Harri
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 353
Ratings: +11
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London
Pre-Assessed..: Yes
App. Filed.......: Dec 2009
Doc's Request.: March 2010
IELTS Request: 7.5 Bands
Med's Request: 24 Feb 2012
Med's Done....: 24 March 2012
Interview........: No news
Passport Req..: PPR1 7 Nov 2012, PPR2 3rd Dec 2012
VISA ISSUED...: 13-Dec-2012
LANDED..........: 14 Feb 2013, Calgary

« Reply #2981 on: March 20, 2012, 07:50:59 am »

Dear Qorax,

Thanks very much for giving a good insight into the Background Check process, but recently I am observing a different trend coming up from CHC London. A large number of 2010 Pakistani FSW applicants of M1 are getting MR, PRPF, PCC and updated Forms, and none of them have received a job verification call from the CIC, before that many of the applicants used to get verification calls and receipt of MR and PRPF was a sign that Background Checks are over on the file and the process can move further.
I also saw few of such applicants who after sending all the required Docs once approached CHC London through a webform were told that "background checks are still pending".
Should we believe that CHC London has changed the process a little bit? Like CHC ND, the background checks can by anytime? even after MR and PRPF. It is my guess that CHC London is in a hurry to clear the large inventory, and planning to carry out Background Checks at a later stage.
Please share your opinion. 
Logged
ali222
Star Member
****

Posts: 168
Ratings: +3
Category........: Other
Visa Office......: london
Job Offer........: Yes
App. Filed.......: 2006
Med's Request: 15-8-2011
Med's Done....: 20-8-2011
Interview........: not
Passport Req..: ppr step 1 on 24 feb 2012 and step 2 28 march 2012
VISA ISSUED...: 5 april 2012
LANDED..........: 7 May 2012

« Reply #2982 on: March 20, 2012, 07:51:40 am »

today i check my ecas and it change from inprocess to decision made and a line is also added to my ecas that a decision has been made on you application and the office will contact you about concerning decision. as i am waiting for ppr step 2 from 23 days .When should i expect ppr step 2 ?
Logged
qorax
VIP Member
*******

Posts: 11789
Ratings: +2117

« Reply #2983 on: March 20, 2012, 08:29:41 am »

Dear Qorax,

Thanks very much for giving a good insight into the Background Check process, but recently I am observing a different trend coming up from CHC London. A large number of 2010 Pakistani FSW applicants of M1 are getting MR, PRPF, PCC and updated Forms, and none of them have received a job verification call from the CIC, before that many of the applicants used to get verification calls and receipt of MR and PRPF was a sign that Background Checks are over on the file and the process can move further.
I also saw few of such applicants who after sending all the required Docs once approached CHC London through a webform were told that "background checks are still pending".
Should we believe that CHC London has changed the process a little bit? Like CHC ND, the background checks can by anytime? even after MR and PRPF. It is my guess that CHC London is in a hurry to clear the large inventory, and planning to carry out Background Checks at a later stage.
Please share your opinion. 

Nothing has changed. That 'calling of updated forms' is part of the b/g checks... done so when the cases were lodged sometime back & they need to know if there were any updates/changes during the long gestation pd. And remember, there's a 'queue' for older apps, which could take years to beat... and that'd show-up in our BF'Ds.

Qorax
Logged

"Do your little bit of good where you are - its those little bits of good put together - that overwhelm the world." -Desmond Tutu

Qorax INDEXED:
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/-t74858.0.html
qorax
VIP Member
*******

Posts: 11789
Ratings: +2117

« Reply #2984 on: March 20, 2012, 08:30:57 am »

today i check my ecas and it change from inprocess to decision made and a line is also added to my ecas that a decision has been made on you application and the office will contact you about concerning decision. as i am waiting for ppr step 2 from 23 days .When should i expect ppr step 2 ?

Congrats!
In a couple of weeks.
Logged

"Do your little bit of good where you are - its those little bits of good put together - that overwhelm the world." -Desmond Tutu

Qorax INDEXED:
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/-t74858.0.html
Pages: 1 ... 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 ... 347   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC