For my own clarification - not necessary to get him his PR, or what? If he can sponsor his children at a later date without the medicals because his ex was a *censored word* and the VO accepts it, ok, but everything I've seen posted here says NO MATTER WHAT if those medicals aren't done, there is no way... I've never seen a post where the VO ok'ed future sponsorship without medicals?
ETA: My DMP (Oregon) said bring passports for all of us, or no exam. The passport number goes on the form and had to be included, there wasn't a way around it.
Not necessary to take his ex to court at this point. Yes, he will have to get the medicals done BUT the VO may provide a letter
instructing the DMP to do the medicals without the passports. DMPs work for CIC and must do as instructed by them.
This forum is NOT a legal resource. It is people sharing their experiences and information. Most are not professionals in this area of law. I am. I know from experience that there IS a way around it. It is not easy but it is possible. I don't care what's written on the forum. His situation is unique and most don't have the experience to advise him. His issue is NOT that he can't make the children available for examination. He can. The issue is that they don't have passports to present at the examination. Very different.