Applications after 26/6 in any NOC CONNECT HERE TO GET THE STATUS

[roseapple08]

Dear all,
Both the CIO checklist and VO specific checklist ask for the following documents:
1. Forms:
(1) Application for Permanence Residence (IMM 0008)
(2) Schedule 1: Background Declaration
(3) Schedule 3: Economic Classes-Federal Skilled Workers
(4) Additional Family Information (IMM 5406)
Do we have to prepare two sets for each office? please advice.

[ammaartahir]

Dear all,
Both the CIO checklist and VO specific checklist ask for the following documents:
1. Forms:
(1) Application for Permanence Residence (IMM 0008)
(2) Schedule 1: Background Declaration
(3) Schedule 3: Economic Classes-Federal Skilled Workers
(4) Additional Family Information (IMM 5406)
Do we have to prepare two sets for each office? please advice.

only one set

[ammaartahir]

Dear all, I am a post June 25, 2010 applicant. My application reached to the CIO on September 02, 2010. At that time my experience was 2 years and 11 months and I claimed points for my 2 years of experience. I could've hold the application for another 1 month and claimed a couple of more points. But the reason I didn't delay was because of the 1000 caps' thing.
Well, I need to know that now that my experience is of 3 years and I need to claim points for these three years, should I email the CIO personnel to award me points for 3 years (as of now), or would they automatically adjust this experience and award me points for 3 years' experience??
After how much time after application receipt do they start calculating points?
I discussed the matter with other senior members and they have advised me to email them and tell them about the current situation.
Could some one also guide me how to email them?
Thanks and best regards

Ammaar

[bd1122]

Hi! BD1122

I really hope this post you mentioned isn`t right.My husband was our primary applicant and he`s employed as a business analyst at a company.All his duties matched those mentioned in the guidelines.As far as the guidelines provided by the cic website,guide etc.I did not not notice anything about having to work externally.Our application was recieved few days back.I really hope everything goes well for both of us.

I also hope that it is not true. But i am really confused. Need help from the experts from here. This link "www5.hrsdc.gc.ca/NOC/English/NOC/2006/Profile.aspx?val=1&val1=1122" says that "They are employed by management consulting firms, advertising agencies and throughout the public and private sectors or are self-employed.".

[bd1122]

Need help from the experts. Does any one know about this?

Hi,

In this board "canada-immigration-discussion-board/noc-1122-after-26-july-2010-join-here-please-t49245.165.html" "MSM-2332" says that under NOC 1122 you have to take into account that you must be an external consultant to the business and not to be employed by the company."

I am senior brand executive in my company and assess characteristics of products of my company to be promoted and advise on the advertising needs as well as develop and implement the advertising campaigns along with our advertising agency.

I have already sent my application. But after reading the above post i am in doubt whether i will be eligible or not.Do you think that one has to be an external consultant to apply for this NOC?

Thanks.

[brabus_]

I mean this with respect, but as far as I understand there is no "queue" of pre-June-26 versus post-June-26. CIC will handle these two pools of applications as it sees fit, and until somebody starts getting regular AORs we will not really know how they are going to do it.

I understand that you feel it would be unfair if post-June-26th applications were processed before yours, but please also understand that post-June-26th do not have the luxury of a limitless application numbers. Since each NOC has a limit of 1000, and 20000 total, then CIC need to ascertain as quickly as possible that the limit is reached so that they can advertise this, to stop thousands (probably tens of thousands) of people going through the massive time and expense of compiling an application which is doomed to failed before it is even sent.

So here is how I see it:

1) If CIC are counting a post-June-26 FSW1 application as being in the "limit" as soon as it passes the completeness check, then IMO it is fine to process all the pre-June-26 applications first, since this does not affect when CIO are able to advertise they have reached the limit

2) If CIC are not counting a post-June-26 FSW1 application as being in the "limit" UNTIL it has had the eligiblity review complete/AOR/ready to send to visa office, then IMO they have to either process these applications first, or at least have a separate team processing them. If they have to wait until all the May+June applications are processed they by the time they get to the July/August applications they will likely have received many applications over the 1000/20000 limits.

Like I said I can understand why you feel it may be unfair, but it is surely more unfair for tens of thousands of people to spend all that time compiling applications to limits that are already full, than May/June applicants waiting a few more weeks for their AORs?

Wayne.

Cappuccino, thank you for your post
I think 1st case is more realistic.

My arguments:
How much time is CIC needed to issue 20000 AOR to fill the CAP, and stop receiving new applications ?
If you answer this question, you will see that it is unrealistic to do that in 1 or 2 months.
Therefore, application IS COUNTED in the CAP pool if it is completed and CC charged, only that.

Every year Sydney processes aprx. 20000-30000 applications, they process them during all YEAR.
Today, we have already 15000-20000 with no AOR at all.
So, Post-june-26 applicants colud receive AOR up to May-June 2011, it depends on when they sent application.

Cappuccino, my wish is that all who applied in Canada immigration receive their AOR and POVL as soon as possible.
I wish everybody goodluck and happiness, nevertheless your applying date, religion or creed or country of origin.
Be positive )

[Cappuccino]

Cappuccino, thank you for your post
I think 1st case is more realistic.

My arguments:
How much time is CIC needed to issue 20000 AOR to fill the CAP, and stop receiving new applications ?
If you answer this question, you will see that it is unrealistic to do that in 1 or 2 months.
Therefore, application IS COUNTED in the CAP pool if it is completed and CC charged, only that.

Every year Sydney processes aprx. 20000-30000 applications, they process them during all YEAR.
Today, we have already 15000-20000 with no AOR at all.
So, Post-june-26 applicants colud receive AOR up to May-June 2011, it depends on when they sent application.

Cappuccino, my wish is that all who applied in Canada immigration receive their AOR and POVL as soon as possible.
I wish everybody goodluck and happiness, nevertheless your applying date, religion or creed or country of origin.
Be positive )

They don't need to issue 20000 AOR, they just to have ascertain that 20000 applications have got to the stage where they count towards the limit. Their wording SUGGESTS that this is when it passes the eligibility review and is placed into processing at visa office, but only CIC knows that for sure.

It really is in CIC's interests to
a) Advertise on their website the moment one of the NOCs reaches the 1000 limit
b) Advertise on their website the moment the total number of FSW1 applications for 2010-2011 reaches 20000

Otherwise as well as costing further applicants a lot of wasted time and money, they are also costing themselves wasted time and money in having to return applications.

So if an application counts towards the limit as soon as it has been card charged/completeness check, they should be able to advertise the limits fairly soon, and then start processing the May/June applicants. If however it counts towards the limit only after an application has passed its eligibility review, then IMO they HAVE to do the post-June-26th applications first else it will be many many months before they can tell when the limit is reached.

Wayne.

[carl128]

All
For weeks I have been watching your posts and finally decided to share my views.
Firstly, Canada processes all new applications based on new rules separately. This means that a different team processes these applications. There has been a delay in processes because of a re-alignment of resources. This is no queue. This means that each set of application will go into separate lines.

Secondly, David Cohen's office has advised that only 10% of applications have gone into process. Many of the applications are being returned and will be returned for minor reasons. This means that applicants will need to be extremely careful when completing applications.

Thanks
KR

are they going to return the application before they encash or after?

[carl128]

Dear all, I am a post June 25, 2010 applicant. My application reached to the CIO on September 02, 2010. At that time my experience was 2 years and 11 months and I claimed points for my 2 years of experience. I could've hold the application for another 1 month and claimed a couple of more points. But the reason I didn't delay was because of the 1000 caps' thing.
Well, I need to know that now that my experience is of 3 years and I need to claim points for these three years, should I email the CIO personnel to award me points for 3 years (as of now), or would they automatically adjust this experience and award me points for 3 years' experience??
After how much time after application receipt do they start calculating points?
I discussed the matter with other senior members and they have advised me to email them and tell them about the current situation.
Could some one also guide me how to email them?
Thanks and best regards

Ammaar

I dont think that you should worry because we need at least 1 year of fuul time work or an equivalent of 37.5 hours a week work for part time.

[indira_prab]

People,

Me again Great theories and analysis catching up Lot of newbies  Welcome to the club

Lot of architects joining the club

Let's keep the fire on

Thanks,

Indira Prabhakaran.

[Rae74]

Hi ,

Can anyone please advise on the below:

I have received the university transcript by speed post yesterday, I have not opened the cover, but I dont see any seal on the part where the envelope is sealed/pasted. Should I send it back to the university for seal or is it fine as it is? The transcripts is in the university envelope itself with speed post seal and everything but the seal is missing on the rear side where the envelope is pasted.

[pun123]

Can you feel another small envelop inside the main envelop. generally university send the main sealed envelop packed inside a bigger envelop(speed post one), thats what I know.

Before you open the main envelop (exposing u'r self to risk) better call university to ask how many envelop inside the speed post envelop.

BTW which is your university

Hi ,

Can anyone please advise on the below:

I have received the university transcript by speed post yesterday, I have not opened the cover, but I dont see any seal on the part where the envelope is sealed/pasted. Should I send it back to the university for seal or is it fine as it is? The transcripts is in the university envelope itself with speed post seal and everything but the seal is missing on the rear side where the envelope is pasted.

[Rae74]

Can you feel another small envelop inside the main envelop. generally university send the main sealed envelop packed inside a bigger envelop(speed post one), thats what I know.

Before you open the main envelop (exposing u'r self to risk) better call university to ask how many envelop inside the speed post envelop.

BTW which is your university

Calicut University , Kerala

[aakash28]

Dear friends,

I made a stupid mistake on my application. My spouse's father name is "Abdul Aziz". But he was also known by Khan, which is father's last name as well. Also, my father in law has deceased in 1998. In all the documents that i have sent along with the application (Spouse BC, Our Marriage certificate), it states "Late Abdul Aziz" there. But on Schedule 1 for my spouse, it is provided as Last Name: Khan and First Name: Abdul. I know its a stupid stupid mistake from my part; somehow "Khan" stayed in my head. But i did not notice it until yesterday. My application is already sent, though it has not arrived at CIO yet. Probably it will reach there tomorrow.

Now, what you experts suggest me? Should i send another Schedule 1 with my spouse signature and an explanation letter stating the situation( with an URGENT stamped on it like some applicants did when they needed to add/update additional information)? or should i just wait? My worry is that, they just might send me the full application back because of the last name is not matching with all other documents.

I am in great dillema now. Please suggest.


  
        
      

[Naija Pikin]

Dear friends,

I made a stupid mistake on my application. My spouse's father name is "Abdul Aziz". But he was also known by Khan, which is father's last name as well. Also, my father in law has deceased in 1998. In all the documents that i have sent along with the application (Spouse BC, Our Marriage certificate), it states "Late Abdul Aziz" there. But on Schedule 1 for my spouse, it is provided as Last Name: Khan and First Name: Abdul. I know its a stupid stupid mistake from my part; somehow "Khan" stayed in my head. But i did not notice it until yesterday. My application is already sent, though it has not arrived at CIO yet. Probably it will reach there tomorrow.

Now, what you experts suggest me? Should i send another Schedule 1 with my spouse signature and an explanation letter stating the situation( with an URGENT stamped on it like some applicants did when they needed to add/update additional information)? or should i just wait? My worry is that, they just might send me the full application back because of the last name is not matching with all other documents.

I am in great dillema now. Please suggest.


  
        
      

CIO does not entertain any follow up letters to an application. There are two likely outcome to this situation(both don't favour you).
1. Your application may be returned, as it may fail the completeness check, that is if they look out for contradictions at this stage.
2. If they don't check for information contradictions at this stage, and still do not do so at eligibility stage, then the problem would arise at your specific Visa office, where the checks are more thorough, and could result in the rejection of your application.
You may consider the foregoing, and probably recall your application if you sent it by courier. I have a friend who noticed errors in his application after it was sent, and immediately tracked it, had it recalled, corrected the error, and  had it resent .
It will only cost more, but you would have prevented long delays or probably lose this year, if the application is returned now, or at a later stage.
GOODLUCK!!