Hi
Hi PMM...
Interestin, and a nice point made. I presume ur reply speaks about the first part of the paragraph i was initially referrin to. Could you please explain me a scenario for the second part of the paragraph..say
"For someone who met the requirements as of the application received date, but no
longer meets them, the reference point should be the application received date. The rule of thumb is
to apply the requirements in a manner that favors the client. Applicants could not self screen before
the Ministerial Instructions were made public"
As i imagine, if some one had a 1 year experience at the time of application, he will have it for the rest of his life. There will be no question of him not havin the experience later say for example today.How can you explain this ??
Except NOC code non conformation, i can not think of any other way in which an applicant meets requirements at the time of application and not meetin them at the time of decsion makin.
May be u if have some more permutations and combinations up ur sleeve, you could share them.
Cheers
That covers persons who had 1 years experience in the "38" between 28/02/98 and 28/02/08, but on 28/11/08 that full years experience was now over 10 years old. An example would be easier to understand.
If Joe Blow worked as 0213 Manager from June 97 to June 98, and from then on worked in a non qualifying NOC if his application had been opened on 28/02/08 he would have had 1 year in a qualifying NOC. But when the Ministerial list was issued on issued 28/11/08, Joe Blow's 1 years experience was more than 10 years ago. So CIC/CHC would give him the benefit of the doubt, by saying that if his application was opened on 28/02/08 his years experience in 0213 was still in the past 10 years.
PMM
Immigration Forum
