CANADAVISA.com Immigration Forum
May 21, 2013, 02:57:29 pm
   Home   Assessment Help Search Login Register RSS  
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 News
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AINP -APPLICATIONS RECEIVED AT ALBERTA OFFICE AFTER JAN 15***(OLD PROCESS)***  (Read 68680 times)
Albertagoverner
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 617
Ratings: +1

« Reply #255 on: April 02, 2009, 03:14:51 pm »

Hero Members ................ please help

i have to go back to India within 20 days ....
i have filled under old process ( pre assessment ), file received by AINP before Feb 19TH  and received a file number ( 8xx) on March 20th
Still waiting for Nomination
Now i am worried what to do ..... will i be able to continue my process from India .... with Nomination pending ....

Should i notify AINP about this ?

Guys please help


Relax. You are under old process. Don't worry. Go to India tell AINP about indian address and recieve nomination at Indian address. Then apply for CIC New Delhi
Logged

Legal Decisions always has its own process. The enforceability, Circumstances and Eligibility. Let it process without any hindrance. Peace!
alabao
Star Member
****

Posts: 60
Ratings: +0
Category........: AINP
Visa Office......: NDVO
App. Filed.......: 28-Jan-2009
Nomination.....: 01-Nov-2011
AOR Received.: 04-May-2012
Med's Request: 18-Jul-2012
Med's Done....: 28-Jul-2012
Interview........: waived
Passport Req..: 18-Jul-2012
VISA ISSUED...: Decision made on 21 Sep 2012 , visa issued on 18th sept 2012
LANDED..........: will do around summer of 2013

« Reply #256 on: April 02, 2009, 03:16:40 pm »

I had a detailed discussion on this one of the AINP people. I hav't recived file number yet though . What they had suggested was inform them of address change and they will send your nomination to india office for you to apply for PR
Logged
joshi77
Member
**

Posts: 19
Ratings: +0

« Reply #257 on: April 02, 2009, 03:17:18 pm »

Should i inform them now or after going to India .

If mean while they ask me to provide recent pay stub ( just like they have asked other guys in old process ) then at that time i have to tell them which will not be proactive

What do you suggest


Hero Members ................ please help

i have to go back to India within 20 days ....
i have filled under old process ( pre assessment ), file received by AINP before Feb 19TH  and received a file number ( 8xx) on March 20th
Still waiting for Nomination
Now i am worried what to do ..... will i be able to continue my process from India .... with Nomination pending ....

Should i notify AINP about this ?

Guys please help


Relax. You are under old process. Don't worry. Go to India tell AINP about indian address and recieve nomination at Indian address. Then apply for CIC New Delhi
Logged
joshi77
Member
**

Posts: 19
Ratings: +0

« Reply #258 on: April 02, 2009, 03:18:34 pm »

Alabo .........Thanks for replying

So there is nothing to worry ,right ?

I had a detailed discussion on this one of the AINP people. I hav't recived file number yet though . What they had suggested was inform them of address change and they will send your nomination to india office for you to apply for PR
Logged
feras80
Guest
« Reply #259 on: April 02, 2009, 03:40:41 pm »

Hello
I have a question regarding the paystub,
my employer reduced my payment to almost the half due of the bad market. he gives me a paystub for 1500$ let's say, and add 800$ to it as expenses, cz as you know he cant go below the minimum wage required for H1. Anyone has the same problem?
Thank you
Logged
Mike053
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 351
Ratings: +0

« Reply #260 on: April 02, 2009, 03:50:52 pm »

Hello
I have a question regarding the paystub,
my employer reduced my payment to almost the half due of the bad market. he gives me a paystub for 1500$ let's say, and add 800$ to it as expenses, cz as you know he cant go below the minimum wage required for H1. Anyone has the same problem?
Thank you


It wont be a problem until some smart guy from this forum or elsewhere calls AINP and say "Dear Sir, Is this a problem?". then whey will realize "ohhhhhhhhhh..... lets put this as a requirement also". All the increased harshness in AINP have been inflicted by the applicants themselves by telling them the issues.

So, in all, it should not be a problem(because TILL DATE there is not any salary regulation for AINP).....
Logged
feras80
Guest
« Reply #261 on: April 02, 2009, 04:20:16 pm »

ya ur right, some smart guys do that

Hello
I have a question regarding the paystub,
my employer reduced my payment to almost the half due of the bad market. he gives me a paystub for 1500$ let's say, and add 800$ to it as expenses, cz as you know he cant go below the minimum wage required for H1. Anyone has the same problem?
Thank you


It wont be a problem until some smart guy from this forum or elsewhere calls AINP and say "Dear Sir, Is this a problem?". then whey will realize "ohhhhhhhhhh..... lets put this as a requirement also". All the increased harshness in AINP have been inflicted by the applicants themselves by telling them the issues.

So, in all, it should not be a problem(because TILL DATE there is not any salary regulation for AINP).....
Logged
Albertagoverner
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 617
Ratings: +1

« Reply #262 on: April 02, 2009, 05:28:19 pm »

ya ur right, some smart guys do that

Hello
I have a question regarding the paystub,
my employer reduced my payment to almost the half due of the bad market. he gives me a paystub for 1500$ let's say, and add 800$ to it as expenses, cz as you know he cant go below the minimum wage required for H1. Anyone has the same problem?
Thank you


It wont be a problem until some smart guy from this forum or elsewhere calls AINP and say "Dear Sir, Is this a problem?". then whey will realize "ohhhhhhhhhh..... lets put this as a requirement also". All the increased harshness in AINP have been inflicted by the applicants themselves by telling them the issues.

So, in all, it should not be a problem(because TILL DATE there is not any salary regulation for AINP).....

Exactly the whole complexity of this program is invited by people itself. Initially the validity definition of H1B was limited to expiration date. They even didn't ask for pay stub but these CSIC consultants and applicants start asking questions and giving them meaning of "H1B status" in terms of USCIS and Department of Homeland security. That's how they start tightening the rules and status requirements. Not only just H1B workers in US but also every stupid immigration consultant was calling AINP office Hotline regarding his US Client and discussing with them the meaning of "Maintained Status" in US terms.
Logged

Legal Decisions always has its own process. The enforceability, Circumstances and Eligibility. Let it process without any hindrance. Peace!
abInMind
Star Member
****

Posts: 52
Ratings: +5

« Reply #263 on: April 02, 2009, 05:49:35 pm »

Members, can anyone please help me on this one?. I posted this on the AINP File No/Timeline topic also, but didnt get an opinion yet, so i am trying it here.

Applied under:                        H1B Category
NOC:                                    2171
Pre Assesment approval dated: 01-05-09
Application mailed on:              01-30-09 (containing ABPNP 003)

I applied with the help of a lawyer who i was involved with when i first applied a year ago to the Federal PR, but my occupation was not in the 38 list. He has confirmed that Alberta should have received the application, as the lawyer sent using registered post. But i have not received a file number yet. Any ideas? Please help.

Regards
SA
Logged
feras80
Guest
« Reply #264 on: April 02, 2009, 06:10:01 pm »

I'd never call the AINP office for such questions. I called them once before sending my application, just to get more information about this new program.

ya ur right, some smart guys do that

Hello
I have a question regarding the paystub,
my employer reduced my payment to almost the half due of the bad market. he gives me a paystub for 1500$ let's say, and add 800$ to it as expenses, cz as you know he cant go below the minimum wage required for H1. Anyone has the same problem?
Thank you


It wont be a problem until some smart guy from this forum or elsewhere calls AINP and say "Dear Sir, Is this a problem?". then whey will realize "ohhhhhhhhhh..... lets put this as a requirement also". All the increased harshness in AINP have been inflicted by the applicants themselves by telling them the issues.

So, in all, it should not be a problem(because TILL DATE there is not any salary regulation for AINP).....

Exactly the whole complexity of this program is invited by people itself. Initially the validity definition of H1B was limited to expiration date. They even didn't ask for pay stub but these CSIC consultants and applicants start asking questions and giving them meaning of "H1B status" in terms of USCIS and Department of Homeland security. That's how they start tightening the rules and status requirements. Not only just H1B workers in US but also every stupid immigration consultant was calling AINP office Hotline regarding his US Client and discussing with them the meaning of "Maintained Status" in US terms.
Logged
felix31
Star Member
****

Posts: 88
Ratings: +0

« Reply #265 on: April 03, 2009, 01:14:26 pm »

If you don't mind wats ur occupation ?

unix sys admin, I am not in 38 occupations so cant do FSW and my UK tier 1 visa came through last week. It took 2 and 1/2 days since the consulate got the application packet to get it approved.
I will move to UK in 2 months, wife will follow as soon as she completes her Masters.

Anyways, I am off to planning my move back to Europe.
I guess after 9 yrs on H1 I hardly have any patience left.
Logged
Indium-sulfide
Guest
« Reply #266 on: April 03, 2009, 01:36:12 pm »

Congratulations!
Logged
Indium-sulfide
Guest
« Reply #267 on: April 03, 2009, 04:15:55 pm »

felix, do you think that category is a permanent residency or temparory worker status.
I have some interest, but have no clue about it.
Logged
felix31
Star Member
****

Posts: 88
Ratings: +0

« Reply #268 on: April 03, 2009, 04:59:44 pm »

If I get Alberta nomination before June, that would be great. I will be able to continue through CIC Vienna in Austria. I am not giving up on Alberta. Its just that I have to leave US before the end of this year, and Alberta is so slow.....

No one knows what future holds, so you make decisions based on what's available to you at the moment. We may not even go to Alberta in the end, or we may not even like UK.

Tier 1 visa - general is a point based system visa. I guess you would call it a work visa for highly skilled workers. It is a much much better visa than H1 in US. Tier 1 general allows great mobility. It is not based on employer or even having to stay in your field. You dont even have to have a job offer to qualify.

You qualify for tier 1 based on education, age, salary level, english language, and savings. I did not score anything on age but had enough on education and salary to qualify as well as proof for language test, and savings statements.

My wife also got tier 1 partner visa. We are both free to live and work for any employer in UK, or start our own business. The only restriction is - no access to public funds and if on tier 1 - no work is allowed as doctor in training. And we earn our time towards citizenship.
 
Though London is an expensive city, I calculated its not much more than living in Washington DC (our current residence). And we will be closer to our families in eastern Europe.
UK taxes are higher but they have universal health care so if you are unnemployed you dont have to worry about being ill and not being able to get medical care.
Logged
Indium-sulfide
Guest
« Reply #269 on: April 03, 2009, 06:04:24 pm »

Thanks a lot.
 Yes, the future is not in our hands. I also do not have age point. Sad, too old to have to set down.
I can get 75 points. I am really considering it.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC