murtazaabbasi
Hero Member
   
Posts: 545
Ratings: +8
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London
NOC Code......: 0213
App. Filed.......: 19-04-2010
Doc's Request.: 12-July-2010
Nomination.....: 00
AOR Received.: 12-July-2010
IELTS Request: 00
File Transfer...: 20-July-2010
Med's Request: 00
Med's Done....: 00
Interview........: 00
Passport Req..: 00
VISA ISSUED...: 00
LANDED..........: 00
|
 |
« on: July 06, 2011, 01:19:36 am » |
|
I am starting this thread for those applicants who applied at 67 score but VO rejected their cases and replied point are less than required. Kindly come at this plateform so as we may guess to see how blindly VO are working
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sr Software Engineer NOC 0213 Visa Office London Application Sent to CIC 19 April 2010 DD Charged 22 June 2010 1st AOR Received 12th July 2010 Full Docs Submitted 30th October 2010 2nd AOR :11-5-2011 Current status:Inprocess:docs pending review
|
|
|
awai ali
Hero Member
   
Posts: 459
Ratings: +6
Category........: FSW2
Visa Office......: London
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2011, 01:22:46 am » |
|
who reject your file?   ?? london visa office or CIO at intial stage?   ?? Visa Office could not refuse the case over points base...........
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Success is not final, Failure is not fatal; It is the courage to continue, “that counts”
|
|
|
murtazaabbasi
Hero Member
   
Posts: 545
Ratings: +8
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London
NOC Code......: 0213
App. Filed.......: 19-04-2010
Doc's Request.: 12-July-2010
Nomination.....: 00
AOR Received.: 12-July-2010
IELTS Request: 00
File Transfer...: 20-July-2010
Med's Request: 00
Med's Done....: 00
Interview........: 00
Passport Req..: 00
VISA ISSUED...: 00
LANDED..........: 00
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2011, 01:45:00 am » |
|
who reject your file?   ?? london visa office or CIO at intial stage?   ?? Visa Office could not refuse the case over points base........... My case is no rejected, but I fear aout that bcs my points are accurate 67 . I have come to know some VOs make sometimes mistake in calculating points if someone has 67 points (for example return application and say you have 66 points), they can make the mistake. London VISA office
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sr Software Engineer NOC 0213 Visa Office London Application Sent to CIC 19 April 2010 DD Charged 22 June 2010 1st AOR Received 12th July 2010 Full Docs Submitted 30th October 2010 2nd AOR :11-5-2011 Current status:Inprocess:docs pending review
|
|
|
canada1234
Champion Member
     
Posts: 2771
Ratings: +85
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London 
App. Filed.......: 10-02-2010
Doc's Request.: 04-05-2010
AOR Received.: 04-08-2010
Med's Request: 04-05-2012
Med's Done....: 12-05-2012
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2011, 01:50:26 am » |
|
Relax! VO's are not that blind too. It must be something leery with those applicants whose applications were returned.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
awai ali
Hero Member
   
Posts: 459
Ratings: +6
Category........: FSW2
Visa Office......: London
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2011, 02:18:30 am » |
|
My case is no rejected, but I fear aout that bcs my points are accurate 67 .
I have come to know some VOs make sometimes mistake in calculating points if someone has 67 points (for example return application and say you have 66 points), they can make the mistake. London VISA office
O Man be positive..................i do nt know why people always create panic at Forum.......I agreed with Canada1234...............
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Success is not final, Failure is not fatal; It is the courage to continue, “that counts”
|
|
|
Triumph
Star Member
   
Posts: 123
Ratings: +13
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2011, 02:28:12 am » |
|
I am starting this thread for those applicants who applied at 67 score but VO rejected their cases and replied point are less than required. Kindly come at this plateform so as we may guess to see how blindly VO are working
Man you should not relay on prediction, if you think you have 67 than you will consider to process
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
awai ali
Hero Member
   
Posts: 459
Ratings: +6
Category........: FSW2
Visa Office......: London
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2011, 02:35:35 am » |
|
And always share personal experience here............please................never tell a story of friend...........
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Success is not final, Failure is not fatal; It is the courage to continue, “that counts”
|
|
|
|
nicholas30
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2011, 07:03:37 am » |
|
May be the VO is not satisfied with the supporting documents to award the 67 points........
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
murtazaabbasi
Hero Member
   
Posts: 545
Ratings: +8
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London
NOC Code......: 0213
App. Filed.......: 19-04-2010
Doc's Request.: 12-July-2010
Nomination.....: 00
AOR Received.: 12-July-2010
IELTS Request: 00
File Transfer...: 20-July-2010
Med's Request: 00
Med's Done....: 00
Interview........: 00
Passport Req..: 00
VISA ISSUED...: 00
LANDED..........: 00
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2011, 07:33:47 am » |
|
May be the VO is not satisfied with the supporting documents to award the 67 points........
you are correct
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sr Software Engineer NOC 0213 Visa Office London Application Sent to CIC 19 April 2010 DD Charged 22 June 2010 1st AOR Received 12th July 2010 Full Docs Submitted 30th October 2010 2nd AOR :11-5-2011 Current status:Inprocess:docs pending review
|
|
|
Cappuccino
VIP Member
     
Posts: 4174
Ratings: +360
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London
NOC Code......: 3131
App. Filed.......: 30-Aug-2010
AOR Received.: 15-Dec-2010
IELTS Request: Sent with app - 8.5 band score
Med's Request: 13-Apr-2011
Med's Done....: 19-Apr-2011
Passport Req..: 28-June-2011
VISA ISSUED...: 21-July-2011
LANDED..........: 27-Aug-2011 ECAS Recd By VO.....: 11-Feb-2011 In Process.......: 15-Mar-2011 Decision Made.: 25-Jun-2011
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2011, 07:39:52 am » |
|
who reject your file?   ?? london visa office or CIO at intial stage?   ?? Visa Office could not refuse the case over points base........... Actually they can. CIO do an eligibility review, but a 2nd eligibility review is done by the visa office to ensure no errors were made by CIO. For example, recently someone was refused through lack of points because visa office did not accept their proof of relative which contributed towards their adaptability points. Yet CIO accepted it, so visa office regrettably can contradict CIO and you are not safely through on points until the visa office have finished their own eligibility review. Wayne.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
omm
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2011, 07:55:58 am » |
|
Absolutly correct Wayne, even if you look in this forum some people create FAKE relationship & they are in-process, anyway, local VO look in deeply about eligibility review by CIO NS, so lack of points or any error in your documents rejection will sure. if VO not satisfied in any documents that means you loss those points and it will be reduce points than 67 (if you have exact 67 points). in this case VO will reject it.
OMM
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
murtazaabbasi
Hero Member
   
Posts: 545
Ratings: +8
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: London
NOC Code......: 0213
App. Filed.......: 19-04-2010
Doc's Request.: 12-July-2010
Nomination.....: 00
AOR Received.: 12-July-2010
IELTS Request: 00
File Transfer...: 20-July-2010
Med's Request: 00
Med's Done....: 00
Interview........: 00
Passport Req..: 00
VISA ISSUED...: 00
LANDED..........: 00
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2011, 08:22:40 am » |
|
Actually they can. CIO do an eligibility review, but a 2nd eligibility review is done by the visa office to ensure no errors were made by CIO.
For example, recently someone was refused through lack of points because visa office did not accept their proof of relative which contributed towards their adaptability points. Yet CIO accepted it, so visa office regrettably can contradict CIO and you are not safely through on points until the visa office have finished their own eligibility review.
Wayne.
That is what i mean , seniors pls put your more comments on it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sr Software Engineer NOC 0213 Visa Office London Application Sent to CIC 19 April 2010 DD Charged 22 June 2010 1st AOR Received 12th July 2010 Full Docs Submitted 30th October 2010 2nd AOR :11-5-2011 Current status:Inprocess:docs pending review
|
|
|
mute_man
Champion Member
     
Posts: 1107
Ratings: +55
Category........: FSW1
Visa Office......: SG
NOC Code......: 3131
App. Filed.......: 21 January 2011
Nomination.....: 23 June 2011
AOR Received.: 20 July 2011
File Transfer...:
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2011, 10:14:15 am » |
|
Actually they can. CIO do an eligibility review, but a 2nd eligibility review is done by the visa office to ensure no errors were made by CIO.
For example, recently someone was refused through lack of points because visa office did not accept their proof of relative which contributed towards their adaptability points. Yet CIO accepted it, so visa office regrettably can contradict CIO and you are not safely through on points until the visa office have finished their own eligibility review.
Wayne.
so, what happens after that? 01. Can We Appeal? 02. What about the Application Fee? 03. and Documents?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 |I THINK, THEREFORE, I AM|
|
|
|
|
canada_dream100
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2011, 10:21:15 am » |
|
My case is no rejected, but I fear aout that bcs my points are accurate 67 .
I have come to know some VOs make sometimes mistake in calculating points if someone has 67 points (for example return application and say you have 66 points), they can make the mistake. London VISA office
If someone has 68 points, can't visa office reject that case by assuming mistake you are anticipating. It is purely a guess work.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
angelbrat
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: July 06, 2011, 03:40:03 pm » |
|
Getting the 67 points does not guarantee your application will be accepted. That is just the minimum bench mark, the application is then assessed for other factors.
An example is a medical worker, whom may get over 67 points with their education score but the VO decides that their language score is not high enough for them to be able to work in their relevant job field, so rejects the application. Another example is again 67 points reached but the job description with the application does not match one of the occupations on the preferred NOC list.
Getting the points is just the start of the process, you need to also factor in other considerations when applying.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|