Home

° About David
° Professional profile
° About this blog
Recent Articles
The Missing Link
Canada Should Reduce Visa Application Fees
Come on in, Just Don't Get Sick
Who is Making our Border Decisions?
Standing Up for Veiled Voters
Preventing Discrimination Versus Encouraging Multi...
Why All the Secrecy?
Buyer Beware
The Right to Sponsor
The Game is Rigged
Canada Immigration Newsletter
Register to receive the monthly Canada Immigration Newsletter!
|Learn More| Latest Edition|
Canada Immigration Eligibility Questionnaire
Submit your Canadian Immigration Eligibility Questionnaire and find out if you qualify. We will email your personalized results to you within 24 hours. This service is provided for FREE.
Monthly Archive

Buyer Beware

June 27, 2007

Buyer Beware

A series of articles in the Toronto Star recently shone a powerful spotlight on the immigration consulting industry. What they found does not speak well for the industry.

First a bit of background on the subject. For many years only lawyers in good standing with their provincial bar association were allowed to represent clients before immigration tribunals. In reality however, individuals seeking to immigrate to Canada were receiving advice from a variety of sources, including consultants from a wide range of backgrounds. With no regulation however, reputable consultants practiced alongside individuals with little in the way of credentials and credibility.

The Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants (CSIC) was created in 2004 as a way to monitor immigration consultants who are not lawyers. CSIC is a self-regulating body meant to ensure that CSIC standards of service quality are met by its members. The incentive to join CSIC is that its members are allowed to represent clients before the Canadian government for immigration matters. This opportunity to be recognized as a visa applicant's agent by the Government of Canada was intended to draw consultants into the fold as a means to standardize the industry.

The investigation by the Toronto Star however unearthed a series of behaviours that show that many clients are still being exploited, and the system is being defrauded. Why hasn't CSIC cleaned up the industry? What it comes down to is that the organization is not enforcing its mission.

The idea was that by creating a standard for professionalism, clients of immigration consultants could be more confident in their services and any unethical and illegal behaviours would be weeded out. Building a standard however takes more than words on a mission statement, it takes active enforcement. Since its founding, the CSIC has not established a pattern of disciplinary proceedings to punish unethical behaviour. Memberships have been revoked for failure to pay dues or to meet language requirements, but very seldom for improper practice.

Unscrupulous behaviour is by no means limited to immigration consultants. The difference however is that if a client is defrauded by a lawyer, his or her law society will use its power to disbar the lawyer. In addition, bar associations can also provide a kind of insurance policy for consumers, by ensuring that defrauded clients are compensated. Potential immigrants, often unfamiliar with the details of Canadian laws and concerned about jeopardizing their applications, are a group whose interests require protecting. The problems highlighted by the Toronto Star investigation show that CSIC is not doing its job.

Even as an organization with voluntary membership, CSIC has within its authority a wide range of options to discipline its members. These tools have not been put to use, and the result is that the industry remains fraught with individuals willing to mislead their consumers and the government, and these individuals are tarnishing the work of others in the field. A concerted effort by CSIC to enforce their mandate will recapture the confidence of honest professionals and of consumers. Until then for those in the process of immigrating to Canada, it remains caveat emptor, or buyer beware, when seeking immigration advice under the CSIC banner.

 

 

5 Comments:

 

 

At July 01, 2007, Blogger car4dave said...

Such is life, it is buyer beware all over. Still, I can see how it is possible for a consultant to mislead a client. There ARE people very desperate to immigrate. I want to myself but know that I cannot and will not let myself be taken in by those people.

 
At July 03, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why do you say that you cannot?

 
At July 16, 2007, Anonymous Dr kola said...

For me getting to canada do worth the trouble l think everything in life is a risk one just have to be creful but determined. l think cohen is my best bet l am coming from nigeria and l have my mind made up to use him.

 
At July 31, 2007, Blogger Right-Hand-Man Virtual Assistant Services said...

Is CSIC responsible to anyone other than itself? Are these "consultants" licensed in any other way by the federal government? Cannot criminal charges be brought against these people for fraud? I guess that would take someone turning them in and if you are trying to get into the country, you may feel powerless to do so. Maybe some immigrants that have been in Canada for a while can join together and shut these operations down.

 
At September 18, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just investigating the prospects for immigrating to Canada now. The Canadian authorities say they will only deal with immigration representatives who are members of CSIC or of the various provincial law societies. So I guess if you're concerned about the reliability of CSIC as a governing body, you should use an adviser who's registered with the law society, which would have powers to punish incompetent or dishonest consultants.

 

Post a Comment

 

Links to this post:
Create a Link

<< Blog Main Page

The Right to Sponsor

June 19, 2007

Equality is a fundamental Canadian value. Whether you are a fifth-generation Canadian or you have just received your Canadian citizenship this morning, you are entitled to exactly the same set of rights and responsibilities. Or at least that's the way it's meant to be.

Family reunification is a stated goal of Canadian immigration policy. Canadian citizens and Permanent Residents may sponsor their parents, grandparents, spouses or children to come to Canada as Canadian Permanent Residents. According to Canadian law this right to bring your family to Canada cannot be denied to any Canadian citizen or Permanent Resident as long as they are residing in Canada and meet sponsorship requirements.

In practice however we can see that this right is not being provided equally to all Canadians. Once an application to sponsor parents or grandparents is approved by the central processing office in Mississauga, Ontario, there is a reasonable expectation that the process will be finalized within a similar time frame no matter where the family member is coming from. A quick look at processing times for parent/grandparent sponsorship applications shows that this expectation is not being satisfied. For the more fortunate applicants, the average application processing time through the Canadian immigration visa office in London is about 7 months; through Cairo it would be 11 months; through the Ankara office in 12 months. At the other end of this spectrum it takes 31 months, on average, to process cases through the Paris or Manila visa offices, 34 months through the New Delhi or Singapore visa offices.

There are a number of reasons why certain Canadian visa offices take longer than others to process applications. Higher volume of applications, not enough staff available, other administrative challenges all can contribute to slowing down processing times. The fact of the matter is, however, that no matter what the explanation is, these drastic differences are unacceptable. For other categories of immigration, Canada's government may place its resources where it deems appropriate; since the applicants are not yet Canadians, they do not have a right to immigrate. For sponsorship of family members however, it is existing Canadians and Permanent Residents whose equality rights are being violated.

When you have differences of two full years in processing times between different visa offices, what it amounts to is discrimination based on the location of a Canadian's parents. Even worse, when parents or grandparents are elderly, long delays can mean that they will no longer pass required medical exams, meaning that in such cases, the right to sponsor is being denied altogether.

One reason that immigrants choose to come to Canada is because they can count on having their rights respected and being treated equally no matter who they are or where they come from. In many ways Canada leads the world in this regard. The Canadian government needs to allocate the necessary resources to make sure that the right to sponsor is respected equally for all Canadians, no matter where their family is.

 

 

3 Comments:

 

 

At November 08, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's very true. The government should improve the sponsorship system. No matter where we originally come from or our parents from... WE ALL PAY THE SAME TAXES HERE and therefore should have "equal" opportunity to reunite with our families.

They are telling us the reasons/problems of such difference but yet not solving the cause. Short of staff? Then put more as it's needed.

Sponsorship is one of the main reasons why we chose come here, now, when our parents or grandparents finally get PR, what's the use of it? if they're already too old or worse... dead.

 
At December 14, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree. I sponsored my husband to gain landed immigrant status in Canada from Venezuela in November, 2006. They began processing his file in December, 2006. We received a request for further information and another medical exam in September, 2007. In the time between he has developed a thyroid problem, so I don't even know if they're going to let him come home. They received the "further" information and medical results back in October. Still haven't heard anything.

We know another couple, where the man is already a landed immigrant in Canada and the women is back in Venezuela. He began the sponsorship process for her around February, 2007 and she has already had her interview. How about that for discrimination!

 
At January 22, 2008, Anonymous Blue said...

Hi. In Denmark where i am from its very very difficult to sponser a spouse. Even worse the parents/granparents and other family members.
The government think that, when you are after a certain age, you should be emotional free of your parents, and be able to live a life in another country without them. I think that the canadians are very lucky.What about making it possible for an employer to sponser his/her employee. Wouldn't it be nice if you could decide who you want to hire for you business !

 

Post a Comment

 

Links to this post:
Create a Link

<< Blog Main Page